XPost: sci.agriculture, can.politics, alt.politics.congress   
   XPost: alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election   
   XPost: alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth   
   XPost: alt.politics.socialism.mao, alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scott   
   .there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here   
   XPost: alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 8/5/22 2:39 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:   
   > https://thenewamerican.com/canadas-fertilizer-cut-equals-less-food/   
   >   
   > Under the guise of honoring Canadian farmers as good stewards of the land,   
   > the government of Canada has implemented a plan to reduce 30% of its   
   > fertilizer use by 2030 in order to meet climate targets. Ultimately the   
   > goal is to have net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. The plan   
   > will effectively cap the fertilizer usage of farmers.   
   >   
   > This is expected to engender catastrophic financial losses for those   
   > reliant on farming for income, as well as potential food shortages. The   
   > Saskatchewan and Alberta ministers of agriculture have expressed their   
   > “profound disappointment” in the Canadian federal government’s   
   “arbitrary   
   > goal.”   
   >   
   > “This has been the most expensive crop anyone has put in, following a very   
   > difficult year on the prairies,” said Nate Horner, Alberta’s minister of   
   > agriculture.   
   >   
   > “The world is looking for Canada to increase production and be a solution   
   > to global food shortages. The federal government needs to display that   
   > they understand this. They owe it to our producers,” he added.   
   >   
   > Industry association Fertilizer Canada called the government’s approach   
   > “short-sighted,” arguing that reducing nitrogen fertilizer use “will   
   have   
   > considerable impact on Canadian farmers’ incomes and reduce overall   
   > Canadian exports and GDP.”   
   >   
   > A report compiled by accounting firm Meyers Norris Penny suggested that   
   > regulated fertilizer reduction could cost Canadian farmers $48 billion by   
   > 2030 and reduce crop sizes.   
   >   
   > Fertilizer Canada claimed, “It is estimated that a 30% absolute emission   
   > reduction for a farmer with 1,000 acres of canola and 1,000 acres of   
   > wheat, stands to have their profit reduced by approximately CND$38,000 –   
   > CND$40,500 (US$29.523 to US$31.465) annually.”   
   >   
   > This represents a loss of $400 million (Canadian; $310 million U.S.) for   
   > wheat farmers, and $396 to $441 million (Canadian; $308 to $343 million   
   > U.S.) for canola farmers.   
   >   
   > Fertilizer Canada also suggested focusing on reducing emissions per bushel   
   > and not using a total cap. Otherwise, they warn, yield crop productivity   
   > will fall below 2020 levels.   
   >   
   > Less food production might lead Canada to depend on food imports from   
   > countries relying on less-sustainable agriculture practices. “We cannot   
   > feed the growing world population with a reduction in fertilizer,” say the   
   > governments of Saskatchewan and Alberta.   
   >   
   > The UN warned earlier this year that global food production in 2023 may   
   > not be able to meet rising demand without proper fertilizer use.   
   >   
   > The Canadian government ignored the potential of worldwide food shortages   
   > by staying focused on GHG output with the reduction of fertilizer use. “We   
   > are continuing to support the development and adoption of practices and   
   > equipment that reduce GHG emissions and improve the sector’s climate   
   > change resiliency. With the experience of fertilizer industry   
   > representatives, farmers and other pertinent groups, we can work together   
   > to identify concrete and innovative steps to help meet our targets,” said   
   > Marie-Claude Bibeau, minister of agriculture and agri-food.   
   >   
   > Eastern Canadian farmers are the most impacted by the planned reduction of   
   > nitrogen use, as approximately 660,000 to 680,000 metric tons of nitrogen   
   > fertilizer are imported from Russia to the region annually. That   
   > represents 85% to 90% of the total nitrogen fertilizer used in the area.   
   >   
   > A 35% tariff on Russian products — including fertilizers — was put in   
   > place in Canada in March after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, not giving   
   > farmers any time to search for alternative sources. However, the U.S.   
   > International Trade Commission rejected a 132.6% duty on Russian   
   > fertilizers, a huge relief for domestic producers who want to keep prices   
   > at manageable levels.   
   >   
   > Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is pushing to implement this plan   
   > even after weeks of protests in the Netherlands that should have proved to   
   > him that the world is not ready to adopt these draconian measures.   
   > Netherlands lawmakers voted to cut down on pollution emissions, primarily   
   > nitrogen oxide and ammonia, by 50 percent across the country by 2030. Tens   
   > of thousands of farmers have gathered across the Netherlands in recent   
   > weeks to protest their government’s plan to reduce nitrous oxide   
   > emissions, arguing it would have disastrous consequences for their   
   > business, and eventually, consumers.   
   >   
   > Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association, a farm advocacy organization,   
   > accused Trudeau’s administration of reaching a decision on fertilizer   
   > without seeking their input. “The target of an absolute reduction in   
   > nutrients used to produce our food was done without consultation with the   
   > fertilizer industry or Canadian grain and oilseed farmers,” they said in a   
   > statement.   
   >   
   > Saskatchewan’s minister of agriculture, David Marit, said, “We’re   
   really   
   > concerned with this arbitrary goal. The Trudeau government has apparently   
   > moved on from their attack on the oil and gas industry and set their   
   > sights on Saskatchewan farmers.”   
   >   
   > It appears that Trudeau, President Joe Biden, and a number of other world   
   > leaders are intent on stopping the inexorable change of Earth’s climate by   
   > imposing edicts on vital industries, namely gas, oil, and now fertilizer.   
   > But at what cost? And who pays?   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   Cap and Trade that will equal higher prices and inflation and equal   
   government created shortages that will cause Government rationing so the   
   Overlords will be the DEATH PANELS. It was always headed for DEATH   
   PANELS from the Democrats whether you voted for it with the   
   WEAPONIZATION of HEALTH CARE being under the GOVERNMENT'S power or NOT.   
      
   It wasn't allowed by the FREE PEOPLE to be taken over by voting or by   
   using the Supreme Court.  That means the GLOBAL WARMING cult of the   
   Democrats had to use what they had to create the famine and the disease   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)