[continued from previous message]   
      
   power.  China built coal fired power plants for it's own GRID system. I   
   read that it was one coal electric-plant a week being turned on.   
      
      
   *END ADDENDUM* <-/   
      
      
      
   You're playing a shell game with the numbers and moving the numbers   
   around to count the EV's as if they're NON CARBON BASED transportation   
   when all you do is put more load on the grid that can only be met with   
   more fossil fuel. Even if you started a program to change the grid to   
   100% solar/wind in the next 5 years it would take another 5 years for   
   those completed systems to reach CARBON NEUTRAL and begin to produce   
   energy that's free from CO2 that it took to manufacture and transport   
   and erect and maintain.  And by the time they are Carbon neutral they   
   will be starting to become less efficient and have more failure from age   
   so the first ones that started producing will start wearing out like the   
   EV cars will do and the defectively assembled panels and turbines and   
   cars will begin to fail meaning that as they all came on line for the   
   sustainable power you'd have to start replacing the older or first ones   
   you installed that will likely be the first to fail... which means that   
   at this time, you're a long ways from having an efficient or sustainable   
   grid that can charge efficient or sustainable EV's.   
      
   I actually like the idea if it's in a place where the infrastructure of   
   the grid and the population density is high... in fact I think that the   
   EPA are idiots because they should be basing much more environment   
   protection based on population density rather than running around   
   managing mud puddles out in rural areas and deserted farm land.  States   
   and cities have their own EPA and health departments and public safety   
   DEPARTMENTS because it's NOT a Federal Power and they should base their   
   local regulations on local population density at least at the State   
   levels of regulation.   
      
   That way they might encourage EV's use in the high density parts of a   
   city or State that has a very extensive Electric GRID to support them.   
      
   Plan a faster and better EV traffic pattern by making every 5th street   
   in the city an EV only street, or make it a one way street with one   
   *center lane* being EV only convince cabs and Uber's to go electric...   
   buy all city vehicles electric... allow free parking for private EV's on   
   city owned property.   
      
   And population density would make them work. CO2 isn't the problem but   
   density and noise and other noxious exhaust and heat and stop and go   
   energy use might make it worth while.   
      
   And businesses that need a high density customer base to pay those high   
   minimum wages might want to have EV's and at home/office or business   
   charging of the EV cars that would be better than seeking a gas station,   
   because it saves on stops and time for employees while they wait in fuel   
   lines. The cars would be charging any time they're back at their desk   
   and over night.   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   The result is DEMOCRATS lies about history and reality to themselves and   
   others means their attempts to figure-out what's wrong is an exercise in   
   futility, because what they think they know they really don't know, and   
   fixing problems without the truth... becomes a fools errand.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)