XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 8/21/22 6:49 PM, KWillis wrote:   
   > On 8/21/2022 2:39 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >> On Sunday, August 21, 2022 at 3:51:51 PM UTC-4, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty,   
   >> brain-damaged fucktard who rode his scooter into a tree while not   
   >> wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and lied:   
   >>> On 8/21/22 2:58 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >>>> On Sunday, August 21, 2022 at 12:03:00 PM UTC-4,   
   >>>> #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his scooter   
   >>>> into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and lied:   
   >>>>> On 8/20/22 2:03 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 10:03:56 AM UTC-4,   
   >>>>>> #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his scooter   
   >>>>>> into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and lied:   
   >>>>>>> On 8/20/22 5:12 AM, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:23:07 PM UTC-4,   
   >>>>>>>> #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his   
   >>>>>>>> scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled   
   >>>>>>>> and lied:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 8/19/22 2:36 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 1:18:59 PM UTC-4,   
   >>>>>>>>>> #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his   
   >>>>>>>>>> scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly   
   >>>>>>>>>> bawled and lied:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/19/22 10:47 AM, KWillis wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/19/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:37:15 +0000, "Lee"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida calls teen ‘too immature’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for an abortion. But forced   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> motherhood is fine?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aug 18   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. That's why there's adoption   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> She *still* is forced to give birth. A woman who gives birth   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> is a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> biological mother, you stupid cocksucker. She should not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> forced to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> give birth.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> If she falls and breaks her arm is she forced to heal by laws   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that say   
   >>>>>>>>>>> we have to treat her in the Emergency room, or does it just   
   >>>>>>>>>>> happen by   
   >>>>>>>>>>> nature with a little help like a cast on her arm?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Same girl different medical issue, same outcome.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Broken arm or pregnancy, everyone makes mistakes and gets   
   >>>>>>>>>>> hurt, the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> question is how they choose to recover from that injury,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> should we just   
   >>>>>>>>>>> cut off the broken arm or try to save it?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Depends on the specific situation: the arm could have been so   
   >>>>>>>>>> mangled and   
   >>>>>>>>>> with higher health side effects risks (gangrene, etc) such   
   >>>>>>>>>> that an amputation   
   >>>>>>>>>> may arguably very well be less traumatic than to live with a   
   >>>>>>>>>> mutilation.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So you're saying it's a case of logic and if you can't save the   
   >>>>>>>>> arm then   
   >>>>>>>>> the last resort would be to amputate it...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> No, I'm saying that situations can quickly get complicated with   
   >>>>>>>> multiple shades   
   >>>>>>>> of grey, so do you really want such decisions to be dictated by   
   >>>>>>>> the State?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And I'm saying that the best possible government is the least   
   >>>>>>> government   
   >>>>>>> necessary to protect human life. And if you notice it's NOT   
   >>>>>>> NATION WIDE   
   >>>>>>> it's 50 shades of gray because there are 50 State Constitutions   
   >>>>>>> that can   
   >>>>>>> solve the problem of a human life being snuffed-out, in 50 different   
   >>>>>>> ways... and the one option of allowing unlimited killing of human   
   >>>>>>> life   
   >>>>>>> inside the uterus is NO longer the only option.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Except that (a) the last statement was never true, and (b) it is   
   >>>>>> trying to deny   
   >>>>>> or ignore the very real costs incurred from regulatory fragmentation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why do you support a ban on clubbing baby seals and then support   
   >>>>>>> allowing human abortions...?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Duplicitous Strawman attempt = I'm done with your post. Rescind   
   >>>>>> your lies before trying again.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> [snip]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Done because you can't prove me wrong?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nope, done whenever you lie.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Democrats do try to ban clubbing of baby seals but want to kill human   
   >>>>> life inside the uterus that can be outside the uterus and looking as   
   >>>>> cute as a baby seal the next day, and some Democrats even want to kill   
   >>>>> them after they have already been born.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Not me, so stop trying to insinuate that.   
   >>>> Try again.   
   >>>   
   >>> And yet you support and vote for Democrats...   
   >>   
   >> When have I ever publicly advocated for any political candidate for   
   >> office?   
   >> Either party. Cite, or apologize.   
   >   
   > This is #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty's standard shtick. Pretty much every   
   > post, he pisses and moans about "Democrats." As I have pointed out   
   > several times, politics is nothing but tribal warfare for   
   > #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty and in fact for every right-wingnut   
   > knuckle-dragger posting here. #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty doesn't know   
   > anything about Republiscum/QAnon vs Democratic policy positions. What   
   > he knows is the Democrats are the Hatfields to his McCoys, or vice-versa   
   > — it doesn't matter which is which — and he just hates them...just   
   > because that's how clan and tribal warfare operates. He doesn't hate   
   > them for anything they do or propose; he hates them only because they're   
   > "the other side." Hartung is the same.   
   >   
   > The really funny thing is, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty is a white cracker in   
   > some shithole southern state, and *all* of his ancestors were Democrats,   
   > up until the two parties *switched positions* on race about 50 years   
   > ago. #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty quite possibly started out as a Democrat   
   > himself, then made the switch. But I *know* his parents and all their   
   > prior ancestors were.   
      
   The truth is always the truth no matter who points it out.   
      
      
      
   Democrats support the Democrats issues and policies, pretending to NOT   
   be a Democrat and supporting those policies while posting support for   
   those policies makes it, NOT just being a Democrat but is show you/them   
   to be a lying Democrat.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|