XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 8/18/22 9:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:   
   > Federal prosecutors investigating the role that former President Donald   
   > J. Trump and his allies played in the events leading up to the Jan. 6,   
   > 2021, attack on the Capitol have issued a grand jury subpoena to the   
   > National Archives for all the documents the agency provided to a   
   > parallel House select committee inquiry, according to a copy of the   
   > subpoena obtained by The New York Times.   
   >   
   > The subpoena, issued to the National Archives in May, made a sweeping   
   > demand for “all materials, in whatever form” that the archives had   
   > given to the Jan. 6 House committee. Those materials included records   
   > from the files of Mr. Trump’s top aides, his daily schedule and phone   
   > logs and a draft text of the president’s speech that preceded the riot.   
   >   
   > It was signed by Thomas P. Windom, the federal prosecutor who has been   
   > leading the Justice Department’s wide-ranging inquiry into what part   
   > Mr. Trump and his allies may have played in various schemes to maintain   
   > power after the former president’s defeat in the 2020 election — chief   
   > among them a plan to submit fake slates of pro-Trump electors in states   
   > actually won by Joseph R. Biden Jr.   
   >   
   > The subpoena was not related to a separate investigation into Mr.   
   > Trump’s retention and handling of classified documents that were   
   > removed from the White House at the end of his tenure and taken to   
   > Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Palm Beach, Fla. That   
   > inquiry led this month to a court-approved search of Mar-a-Lago during   
   > which federal agents carted off several boxes of sensitive materials.   
   >   
      
   Which makes it a PHISHING scam by the lawyers and the courts since there   
   is no crime and that means there was no "basis" for a warrant.   
      
   Warrants have to be specific about a place and item being searched for   
   in order to search for the evidence that someone has...   
      
   " *no Warrants shall issue* , but upon probable cause, supported by Oath   
   or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched,   
   and the persons or things to be seized."   
      
   The Judge who authorized a PHISHING expedition by the CORRUPT FBI   
   deserves to be impeached and to lose their office of power.   
      
   Who swore the oath and what was the target, and how did the FBI acquire   
   that information without a warrant and what law was it directly   
   violating? It seems we need protection from our government...   
      
   > Asking the National Archives for any White House documents pertaining   
   > to the events surrounding Jan. 6 was one of the first major steps the   
   > House panel took in its investigation. And the grand jury subpoena   
   > suggests that the Justice Department has not only been following the   
   > committee’s lead in pursuing its inquiry, but also that prosecutors   
   > believe evidence of a crime may exist in the White House documents the   
   > archives turned over to the House panel.   
   >   
      
      
   "believe evidence of a crime may exist"   
      
   What crime and what documents and who has the evidence that exposed this   
   crime that doesn't exist yet because they can't name it?   
      
   How did they get a warrant for crimes they can't describe that violate   
   laws they don't list for documents they can't describe that are   
   "believed" to exist by a person that can't support that claim by oath or   
   affirmation (which is testify under oath as being fact)?   
      
   It's all illegally PHISHING for anything they can find that they can use   
   because they are desperate to stop TRUMP from running in 2024, like   
   scammers PHISH for information with e-mails that trick you into   
   answering questions that the criminals then use to steal from you...   
      
   The FBI and the DOJ are reduced to being common criminals in their quest   
   to gain and hold power for their PUPPET MASTERS.   
      
   NOT only should the Judge issuing the warrant be impeached so should   
   Attorney General Merit Garland as well as firing the Head of the FBI   
      
   > Card 1 of 9   
   > Making a case against Trump. The House committee investigating the Jan.   
   > 6 attack is laying out a comprehensive narrative of President Donald J.   
   > Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Here are the main themes   
   > that have emerged so far from eight public hearings:   
      
      
   Narratives need supporting facts and the committee is NOT a court where   
   they have to prove those facts they include in their narratives..... and   
   the target of their investigation has no representation to disprove that   
   FAKE NARRATIVE...   NOT to mention that we saw the same bad actors push   
   the HILLARY/RUSSIA dossier that they said was absolute proof that TRUMP   
   was guilty of a crime.   
      
   It seems they lied.   
      
      
      
   >   
   > Mr. Trump fought the release of the White House papers almost   
   > immediately after the House committee first asked the archives for them   
   > last August, claiming they were protected by executive privilege. But   
   > in January, after protracted litigation, the case reached the Supreme   
   > Court, which ruled against Mr. Trump, clearing the way for the panel to   
   > get access to the material.   
   >   
   > During the court fight, it was revealed that Mr. Trump had asserted   
   > executive privilege over at least 770 pages of documents. They included   
   > records from the files of Mark Meadows, his former chief of staff;   
   > Stephen Miller, one of his former senior advisers; and Patrick F.   
   > Philbin, his former deputy counsel.   
   >   
   > Mr. Trump also objected to the release of the White House Daily Diary —   
   > a record of the president’s movements, phone calls, trips, briefings,   
   > meetings and activities — as well as logs showing phone calls to the   
   > president and to Vice President Mike Pence concerning Jan. 6.   
   >   
   > The trove of documents obtained by the committee also included proposed   
   > talking points for Kayleigh McEnany, Mr. Trump’s former press   
   > secretary, and a draft text of a presidential speech for the “Save   
   > America” rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol.   
   >   
   > Many of those documents could prove useful to Mr. Windom and his team   
   > of criminal investigators as they seek to determine whether anyone   
   > broke the law as officials in the White House, pro-Trump lawyers and   
   > Mr. Trump’s allies in state legislatures and state Republican parties   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)