XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics
XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama
XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,
lt.politics.trump
XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse
XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars
XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,
alt.politics.guns
From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov
On 8/24/22 2:05 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 8/24/22 12:50, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> In article ,
>> David Hartung wrote:
>>
>>> A human with XY chromosomes is not female, prove me wrong.
>>
>> It's easy for you to look up and you refuse to learn each time
>> you are told. It makes sense you worship the prince of lies.
>
> https://areomagazine.com/2017/07/29/what-science-has-to-say-ab
ut-gender-identity/
>
> [...]
> To be clear, science does not yet have a definitive answer regarding the
> biology of gender identity. The underlying biology is complex and
> particularly difficult to study in humans. But at the same time, it is
> quite clear that if lawmakers, lawyers, and presidents are to engage in
> a debate that turns on biology, then state-of-the-art biological science
> must be part of the discussion.
> [...]
>
> In other words, scientists do not know if it is possible for one to be
> genetically male, and yet be a woman. In other words, transgender is a
> political ideology, not a scientific reaity.
"Female" of a species can be more precise, than woman but a word like
"woman" means female and so much more, I have to ask, what scientific
definition will tell you a woman is a money grubbing succubus that wants
to drain the life out of their male? Do we call a female Black Widow
Spider, a woman or a FEMALE Spider. Woman seems to attribute uniquely
cerebral and sexual human traits. And all those things we call instincts
that can't be explained by the learning process must come from
somewhere, and that somewhere is going to most likely be the DNA.
Is there a uniquely female instinct that women use when looking for a
mate that isn't transferred when a male has cosmetic surgery and is
given hormones to look more female... is fooling the humans visual test
any better than a magician that fools the human eye? Is being Trans just
a trick? Like Duck hunters attract ducks with decoys and then the ducks
end up as dinner for the hunters. Women wanted to be hunters like men
and hunt their sexual prey and now men want to be women (because women
have become the hunters?) and wear camouflage or get surgery to have the
right bait, what do they use as their decoy/bait to bag their trophy?
On occasion we do call "a woman" a Black Widow because the female of
both species show similar traits. But all in all, women are the natural
female humans with all the little quirks that go with that, in the human
species. NOT the Trans who uses nip-tuk surgery and implants and
hormones and silicone to create the artificial female, or a woman who
wears MAKE-UP to look more "attractive" who isn't more of a female than
she was before she put the MAKE-UP on... she is still the same female.
Surgery of Genitals... doesn't create a female any more than make-up can
create a female or make her more healthy or younger. It's called
cosmetic surgery for a reason.
Whether we care about all those cosmetics is a timeless discussion and a
source of plenty of humor as "women" shed their cosmetic enhancements
and spandex body socks and the partner begins to see or sees suddenly
when the lights are turned on, what is real rather than what was visual
deception and in his mind... which is why BEER GOGGLES are in the
current lexicon.
--
-That's karma-
The result is DEMOCRATS lies about history and reality to themselves and
others means their attempts to figure-out what's wrong is an exercise in
futility, because what they think they know they really don't know, and
fixing problems without the truth... becomes a fools errand.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
