XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 8/26/22 2:09 PM, David Hartung wrote:   
   > On 8/26/22 13:05, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> On 8/26/2022 10:55 AM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>> On 8/26/22 12:53, Blue Lives Matter wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:37:11 -0500, David Hartung    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 8/26/22 05:46, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/technology-california-air-reso   
   rces-board-climate-and-environment-dc75c11280f85a8ab134cf392497be68   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>> SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California set itself on a path Thursday to   
   >>>>>> end the era of gas-powered cars, with air regulators adopting the   
   >>>>>> world’s most stringent rules for transitioning to zero-emission   
   >>>>>> vehicles.   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It is important to understand that battery powered electric   
   >>>>>> vehicles are   
   >>>>>> not necessarily "zero emission". A battery merely stores energy, and   
   >>>>>> while the vehicle itself may not have any "tail pipe" emissions",   
   >>>>>> if the   
   >>>>>> electricity used to charge the battery comes from traditional   
   >>>>>> petrochemical sources, total emissions are on a par with those   
   >>>>>> vehicles   
   >>>>>> powered by an internal combustion engine.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>> The move by the California Air Resources Board to have all new cars,   
   >>>>>> pickup trucks and SUVs be electric or hydrogen by 2035 is likely to   
   >>>>>> reshape the U.S. auto market, which gets 10% of its sales from the   
   >>>>>> nation’s most populous state.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But such a radical transformation in what people drive will also   
   >>>>>> require   
   >>>>>> at least 15 times more vehicle chargers statewide, a more robust   
   >>>>>> energy   
   >>>>>> grid and vehicles that people of all income levels can afford.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> “It’s going to be very hard getting to 100%,” said Daniel   
   Sperling, a   
   >>>>>> board member and founding director of the Institute of Transportation   
   >>>>>> Studies at the University of California, Davis. “You can’t just wave   
   >>>>>> your wand, you can’t just adopt a regulation — people actually   
   >>>>>> have to   
   >>>>>> buy them and use them.”   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I may well be wrong, but this has all the markings of a disaster   
   >>>>>> in the   
   >>>>>> making.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It would be far better to allow the EV industry and infrastructure to   
   >>>>>> grow organically and let the market drive the conversion. It may take   
   >>>>>> longer, but in the end it will be better.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Also, this "law" was made by un-elected regulators in California and   
   >>>>> according to what I heard this morning on Morning Edition, it mus   
   >>>>> now be   
   >>>>> approved by un-elected Federal regulators.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They've got a long time to 2035 to fix this if it looks bad. At any   
   >>>> rate, it's another good reason to stay clear of California.   
   >>>   
   >>> Absolutely.   
   >>   
   >> You're a fucking moron.  Despite the wacky politics, *everything* is   
   >> better in California than in your shithole, and that's even taking   
   >> into account the high cost of housing.  Better food, better scenery,   
   >> better weather, better people, better job prospects, orders of   
   >> magnitude more good things to do.  It's just better in every way.   
   >   
   > Have you ever been to Mississippi?   
      
   How much investment did California just disenfranchise from the State of   
   California and the Democrats who run the FALSELY NAMED Democratic party...   
      
      
   Anyone in the Stock market who has any stocks that are connected to   
   thing's made using fossil fuel and the actual production of fossil fuel   
   and gets an income from fossil fuel directly or indirectly which include   
   things NOT related to fossil fuel that are used in making or maintaining   
   things that do use fossil fuel... they all just decided to sell or to   
   hold and if they sell they're joining California and might as well   
   move/live there in their utopia of NO fossil fuel.... which has been   
   built 100% by fossil fuel...   
      
      
   It's kind of like slavery/racism, to Democrats no matter how long or far   
   away it was in time or how many generations have passed, they're still   
   Slave owners/polluters... because they live in a California that was   
   built on the backs of that fossil fuel. As they tell us our nation was   
   built on the backs of slaves.   
      
   Remember that No matter how many generations have passed if you're   
   white, male heterosexual you're a slave owner descendant and a racist,   
   and no matter how many generation pass, (According to Democrats cult   
   mythology) you can never wash your hands of being the descendants of   
   fossil fuel abusers any more than you could being a slave owner and   
   that's just like being a slave owner.... it's a bill of attainder and a   
   corruption of blood that can't be changed.  Your children and your   
   children's children and theirs and theirs....  are all tantamount to   
   slave owners... You're fossil fuel owners and polluters... one and all.   
      
   You built your life on the back of Fossil fuel pollution... and we need   
   reparations from you.... California owes us.   
      
   Think of me like you think of ANTIFA and #BLM when you sign that check   
   to ease your conscience... I'm the oppressed.   
      
   I'll send a P.O. for you to mail my checks to, when I'm Ready.   
      
      
      
   --   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   -That's Karma-   
      
   *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*   
   *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate   
   censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them   
   prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't   
   find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then   
   you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the   
   Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have   
   a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".   
   https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-   
   oter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html   
      
   *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is   
   145 - "The unexamined life is not worth living."   
            -Socrates-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)