XPost: law.court.federal, alt.law-enforcement.corruption, alt.politics.congress   
   XPost: alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election   
   XPost: alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth   
   XPost: alt.politics.socialism.mao, alt.politics.trump, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intellige   
   t-life.down-here, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.politics.org.fbi   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 8/31/22 1:28 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:   
   > https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/29/redacted-mar-a-lago-affidavit-   
   > confirms-bidens-doj-fished-for-a-crime-to-pin-on-trump/   
   >   
   > Manipulating the criminal code to find a basis to search the home of a   
   > political enemy represents an appalling weaponization of the criminal   
   > justice system.   
   >   
   > The search warrant affidavit unsealed on Friday confirms the Department of   
   > Justice used a bait-and-switch tactic to justify the FBI’s unprecedented   
   > raid on former President Donald Trump’s home. The unredacted portions of   
   > the affidavit further expose the Biden administration’s manipulative and   
   > tenuous basis for the search and its reliance on inapplicable federal   
   > criminal code provisions to justify the targeting of a political enemy.   
   >   
   > At noon on Friday, the search warrant affidavit used by the DOJ to obtain   
   > a warrant to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home hit the public court docket,   
   > albeit with heavy redactions. While sparse, the unredacted portions of the   
   > affidavit nonetheless proved significant, especially when read in   
   > conjunction with the previously unsealed search warrant and the leaks to   
   > the compliant media cartel.   
   >   
   > “The government is conducting a criminal investigation concerning the   
   > improper removal and storage of classified information in unauthorized   
   > spaces, as well as the unlawful concealment or removal of government   
   > records,” the affidavit opened, before noting that “the investigation   
   > began as a result of a referral the United States National Archives and   
   > Records Administration (NARA) sent to the United States Department of   
   > Justice (DOJ) on February 9, 2022.”   
   >   
   > The affidavit then summarized the background of the NARA referral,   
   > explaining that “on February 9, 2022, the Special Agent in Charge of   
   > NARA’s Office of Inspector General sent a referral via email to the DOJ.”   
   > The referral explained that the NARA’s White House Liaison Division   
   > director had reviewed 15 boxes NARA had retrieved from Mar-a-Lago   
   > including “newspapers, magazines, printed news articles, photos,   
   > miscellaneous print-outs, notes, presidential correspondence, personal and   
   > post-presidential records, and ‘a lot of classified records.’” “Of   
   most   
   > significant,” the search warrant affidavit explained, was that “highly   
   > classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and   
   > otherwise unproperly [sic] identified.”   
   >   
   > While the next nearly eight pages of the search warrant affidavit remained   
   > redacted, the disclosures that followed exposed the affidavit’s focus on   
   > “classified records” as a sham. “On or about May 6, 2021, NARA made a   
   > request for the missing PRA records and continued to make requests until   
   > approximately late December 2021 when NARA was informed twelve boxes were   
   > found and ready for retrieval at the [Mar-a-Lago],” the affidavit   
   > continued, with the abbreviation “PRA” previously noted to stand for the   
   > Presidential Records Act.   
   >   
   > As I explained previously, to fully comprehend the Biden administration’s   
   > weaponizing of the DOJ and FBI, it is necessary to understand the   
   > Presidential Records Act, the concept of “presidential records,” and the   
   > NARA’s role, and the search warrant affidavit’s references to those   
   > concepts confirm that point. In short:   
   >   
   > “The Presidential Records Act provides that documents created or received   
   > by the president or his immediate staff, such as memos, letters, notes,   
   > emails, and other written communications, related to a president’s   
   > official duties, constitute ‘presidential records’ and must be preserved.   
      
   And should all be preserved especially if they are proof of criminal   
   activity... the fact they were preserved and NOT destroyed by TRUMP is   
   proof there was no criminal actions to hide any crime.   
      
      
   > The act further declares that the United States shall retain complete   
   > ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records.’ And at the   
   > conclusion of a president’s term in office   
      
   Unconstitutional since the President has the power to use all documents   
   and to distribute them as needed.  It's a constitutionally delegated   
   power... to protect the United States and the U.S. Constitution and   
   congress and Bureaucrats can't delegate that power to the NARA.   
      
   All they can do is allow the NARA to do what the Presidents power allow   
   the President to do under the Presidents name since the President is the   
   Executive office and wields all the powers delegated to the Executive,   
   the bureaucrats have no delegated powers. Which means that they are all   
   subject to the laws but the President is not bound by laws that   
   contradict the Presidents delegated powers. Basically the President is   
   indeed above the law where he is delegated powers from the Constitution.   
     Those delegated powers can not be restricted or removed by a law.   
      
   Which means the FBI violated the sovereign office of the Presidency when   
   they got a warrant to enforce laws that are NOT constitutionally   
   applicable to the President or to the Documents that the President chose   
   to allow o be removed.   
      
   Unless of course they had proof that those very documents they took were   
   covering up a crime? And their warrant didn't show proof of that.  It   
   means they had no legal grounds to be getting a warrant.  Either the DOJ   
   and FBI and the Judge were all incompetent causing those checks and   
   balances to fail, or it was a conspiracy and they all need to be charged   
   as co-conspirators in a criminal Coup D`etat attempt to undermine TRUMPS   
   political campaign for office.   
      
      
   > , the ‘Archivist of the United   
   > States’ ‘assumes responsibility for the custody, control, and   
   preservation   
   > of, and access to, the Presidential records.’”   
   >   
   > The Presidential Records Act, however, expressly excludes specific   
   > documents from the definition of “presidential records,” including any   
   > documentary materials that are “official records of an agency,”   
   “personal   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)