XPost: law.court.federal, alt.politics.org.fbi, alt.politics.congress   
   XPost: alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election   
   XPost: alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth   
   XPost: alt.politics.socialism.mao, alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scott   
   .there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here   
   XPost: alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 9/1/22 4:10 AM, zinn wrote:   
   > Mike Davis, a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch,   
   > should be one of your go-to legal sources to sift through all the nonsense   
   > being spewed about the smoking gun classified documents the FBI seized   
   > from Mar-a-Lago on August 8. We’ve cited his legal commentaries here in   
   > previous posts. The latest updates dropped early this morning, with   
   > Justice Department declaring that Trump’s special master motion should be   
   > denied because anyone else analyzing the documents could constitute a   
   > national security risk. A judge last weekend issued her preliminary intent   
   > to appoint a special master, which the DOJ countered by saying they had   
   > already reviewed the documents—materials so sacred and top secret they   
   > threw them on the floor and took a photo. Spencer wrote about that this   
   > morning. You can see the filings, one of which is clippings of Time   
   > Magazine covers. Where are the nuclear secrets hidden on-site, one of the   
   > reasons reportedly offered to justify the raid on Trump’s home?   
   >   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > Greg Price   
   > @greg_price11   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > The "Top Secret" Mar-a-Lago documents were so secret and Earth-   
   > shatteringly important that the FBI agents dumped them on the floor and   
   > took pictures of them for their Blue Anon friends in the media.   
   > 7:15 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 4.7K   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > As noted, the media is trying to make this a ‘Trump is like Hillary’   
   > regarding handling classified materials, which is simply false. Based on   
   > legal precedent and the powers of the office of the presidency, the   
   > federal ransacking, as Spencer noted, looks even worse. We all knew the   
   > liberal media was excruciatingly ignorant of the Second Amendment and   
   > firearm lexicon. It’s now leeched into executive powers, which isn’t   
   > shocking. Davis once again took to Twitter to gut the legal basis for the   
   > raid while also torching the Biden Justice Department for their   
   > fundamental misunderstanding of the law concerning the president’s powers   
   > in handing classified materials. It’s another headshot to the narrative   
   > that this raid was about legal documents.   
   >   
   > Davis notes how Congress expects former presidents to possess classified   
   > materials. The Presidential Records Act, which isn’t a criminal statute,   
   > doesn’t differentiate between classified and unclassified, and ex-   
   > presidents have staff with security clearances, secure offices, and Secret   
   > Service protection. There was no danger of whatever the FBI alleges was at   
   > Mar-a-Lago falling into unsavory hands. Davis again reiterates that Trump   
   > declassified the documents in question, kept copies, and was under Secret   
   > Service protection.   
   >   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Biden DOJ has a fundamental misunderstanding of the law.   
   >   
   > The President has the power to declassify records and take personal copies   
   > when he leaves office.   
   >   
   > Commander-in-Chief Clause trumps Espionage Act.   
   >   
   > Presidential Records Act trumps general statutes on government property.   
   > 8:26 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > Read the full conversation on Twitter   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1564997985955565572   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Replying to @mrddmia   
   > Congress expects former Presidents to have classified and other   
   > presidential records.   
   >   
   > Presidential Records Act doesn't differentiate between classified and   
   > unclassified.   
   >   
   > They get federally funded staff, security clearances, secure offices   
   > (SCIFs), and Secret Service Protection.   
   > 8:36 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 834   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1565000637074382848   
   >   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Replying to @mrddmia   
   > The law treats Presidents differently than everyone else.   
   >   
   > Period.   
   >   
   > Guess who wasn't--and never will be--President?   
   >   
   > @HillaryClinton.   
   >   
   > So why wasn't she charged with espionage, destruction of gov't property,   
   > and obstruction after she destroyed her illegal home server and phones?   
   > 8:39 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 1K   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1565001406938959872   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Replying to @mrddmia   
   > Publicly, the Biden Justice Department pretend their unprecedented,   
   > unnecessary, and unlawful home raid on President Trump was to get back   
   > classified records and government property.   
   >   
   > He declassified them.   
   >   
   > He kept a personal copy.   
   >   
   > They were guarded by the Secret Service.   
   > 8:42 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 842   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1565002003775860736   
   >   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Replying to @mrddmia   
   > If Trump's records were in such danger of getting into the wrong hands,   
   > why did:   
   >   
   > - Biden wait 18 months to get them?   
   >   
   > - Garland deliberate "for weeks" before ordering raid?   
   >   
   > - He wait 3 days to execute warrant--after judge-shopping & obtaining   
   > warrant from clearly biased judge?   
   > 8:45 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 877   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1565002933913075712   
   >   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Replying to @mrddmia   
   > Why has Biden administration been leaking and lying, including illegally   
   > from grand jury, throughout this case?   
   >   
   > 1. Garland didn't approve raid? Lie.   
   >   
   > 2. Trump had "nuclear documents"? Lie.   
   >   
   > 3. Biden wasn't involved in raid? Lie.   
   >   
   > 4. Redact--then selectively leak--affidavit.   
   > 8:51 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 916   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1565004307539251200   
   >   
   >   
   > ???? Mike Davis ????   
   > @mrddmia   
   > ·   
   > Follow   
   > Replying to @mrddmia   
   > The Biden raid on Trump was unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful.   
   >   
   > It was a political hit.   
   >   
   > Trump had his personal copy of the declassified Crossfire Hurricane /   
   > Russian collusion records.   
   >   
   > And they are very damning for Obama, Biden, Hillary, Susan Rice, Clapper,   
   > FBI, intel.   
   > 8:56 AM · Aug 31, 2022   
   > 1K   
   > Reply   
   > Share   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)