home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,449 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to Just Wondering   
   Re: How many mass shootings there vs in    
   06 Sep 22 10:52:39   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, or.politics   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 9/5/22 11:01 PM, Just Wondering wrote:   
   > On 9/5/2022 9:04 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:   
   >>   
   >> As long as there one murder anywhere is the world, it proves gun   
   >> control doesn't work to prevent murder, so all gun controls are   
   >> useless and should be repealed.   
   >   
   > That's quite a red herring/strawman you've got there.   
      
   Wanting to be like EUROPE over looks the instibillity of those NATIONS   
   and how it led to TWO WORLD WARS in ONE CENTURY and there were millions   
   upon MILLIONS of humans (both civilian and Military) killed in those   
   wars, which means that banning guns may have caused even more deaths   
   than the U.S. which has less death but higher personal ownership of guns   
   for personal protection.   
      
      
   If guns as PERSONAL PROTECTION don't reduce deaths in a war why do you   
   hand them out to your own TROOPS to stay alive?  And if more people die   
   in a war then keeping all out war between NATIONS should be the goal and   
   that would mean preventing wars should be the actual goal and the   
   POPULATION having their own guns is a likely way to reduce, all-out-war   
   since conflicts that result in fights to the death locally are more   
   likely to quell the urge to create violence NATIONALLY.   
      
   Al in all, it's probably safer in the USA than in EUROPE when you   
   calculate all the death during wars and where they happened. You being   
   safer in the USA then you might want to re-think your fear of guns and   
   instead FEAR European GOVERNMENTS, because they are presently leading us   
   into a war that will NOT just kill Millions but the additional disease   
   and starvation will kill Billions.  Figure that one into your Europe is   
   much safer algorithm....   Safer is relative to the years you live.   
      
      
   I'll keep the guns close and the Sociopath's and Murderers closer,   
   rather than setting them up in power in Europe and NATO and the United   
   Nations with Armies and NUCLEAR WEAPONS and all the guns and the ability   
   to herd people into Concentration camps...  we've seen where that leads.   
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   The result is DEMOCRATS lies about history and reality to themselves and   
   others means their attempts to figure-out what's wrong is an exercise in   
   futility, because what they think they know they really don't know, and   
   fixing problems without the truth... becomes a fools errand.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca