Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,449 of 12,782    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to Just Wondering    |
|    Re: How many mass shootings there vs in     |
|    06 Sep 22 10:52:39    |
      XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics       XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama       XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,        lt.politics.trump       XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse       XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars       XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,       alt.politics.guns, or.politics       XPost: alt.politics.democrats       From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov              On 9/5/22 11:01 PM, Just Wondering wrote:       > On 9/5/2022 9:04 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:       >>       >> As long as there one murder anywhere is the world, it proves gun       >> control doesn't work to prevent murder, so all gun controls are       >> useless and should be repealed.       >       > That's quite a red herring/strawman you've got there.              Wanting to be like EUROPE over looks the instibillity of those NATIONS       and how it led to TWO WORLD WARS in ONE CENTURY and there were millions       upon MILLIONS of humans (both civilian and Military) killed in those       wars, which means that banning guns may have caused even more deaths       than the U.S. which has less death but higher personal ownership of guns       for personal protection.                     If guns as PERSONAL PROTECTION don't reduce deaths in a war why do you       hand them out to your own TROOPS to stay alive? And if more people die       in a war then keeping all out war between NATIONS should be the goal and       that would mean preventing wars should be the actual goal and the       POPULATION having their own guns is a likely way to reduce, all-out-war       since conflicts that result in fights to the death locally are more       likely to quell the urge to create violence NATIONALLY.              Al in all, it's probably safer in the USA than in EUROPE when you       calculate all the death during wars and where they happened. You being       safer in the USA then you might want to re-think your fear of guns and       instead FEAR European GOVERNMENTS, because they are presently leading us       into a war that will NOT just kill Millions but the additional disease       and starvation will kill Billions. Figure that one into your Europe is       much safer algorithm.... Safer is relative to the years you live.                     I'll keep the guns close and the Sociopath's and Murderers closer,       rather than setting them up in power in Europe and NATO and the United       Nations with Armies and NUCLEAR WEAPONS and all the guns and the ability       to herd people into Concentration camps... we've seen where that leads.                     --       -That's karma-              The result is DEMOCRATS lies about history and reality to themselves and       others means their attempts to figure-out what's wrong is an exercise in       futility, because what they think they know they really don't know, and       fixing problems without the truth... becomes a fools errand.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca