XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 9/10/22 7:16 PM, ChopSuey wrote:   
   > On 2022-09-10, Lustern  wrote:   
   >> More lies from the CDC exposed.   
   >>   
   >> "CDC Admits Post-Vaccine Myocarditis Concerns That Were Labeled Covid   
   >> Misinformation Are Legit"   
   >>   
   >> > myocarditis-concerns-that-were-labeled-covid-misinformation-are-legit/>   
   >>   
   >> "In context, the CDC’s latest numbers about post-vax myocarditis   
   >> represent a significant departure from last year’s narrative pushed by   
   >> health bureaucrats and the media.   
   >>   
   >> Author Sophia Corso profile   
   >> SOPHIA CORSO   
   >> MORE ARTICLES   
   >> SHARE   
   >> Share Article on Facebook   
   >> Share Article on Twitter   
   >>   
   >> Copy Article Link   
   >> Share Article via Email   
   >> When reports first surfaced in 2021 that some cases of myocarditis — the   
   >> inflammation of the heart muscle, potentially leading to blood clots and   
   >> heart attack or stroke — were potentially associated with the Covid-19   
   >> vaccine, the corporate media and its fact-checkers were quick to label   
   >> them as misinformation, saying the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh   
   >> its small risks.   
   >>   
   >> A year later, though, the media can no longer deny that what they called   
   >> misinformation actually has data to back it up. As Matt Shapiro detailed   
   >> in his Substack post on the matter, “Last year’s misinformation on   
   >> vaccine-associated myocarditis in young men is this year’s well-   
   >> established fact.”   
   >>   
   >> According to Vaccine Safety Datalink surveillance data from the Centers   
   >> for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted in 2022, within a week   
   >> of receiving the “Dose 2 Primary Series” of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine,   
   >> there were 14 verified cases of myocarditis or pericarditis among the   
   >> 102,091 males aged 16-17 who got the shot. Among the nearly 206,000 12-   
   >> 15-year-old males who received the same series, 31 cases were confirmed   
   >> within a week.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> These numbers might seem small or meaningless, but in context, they   
   >> represent a significant departure from last year’s conventional wisdom   
   >> pushed by health bureaucrats and parroted by the media: In 2021, the   
   >> CDC’s reported rates of myocarditis during the 0-7 day “risk period”   
   >> following vaccination were significantly lower compared to recent   
   >> numbers.   
   >>   
   >> For instance, in August last year, the CDC reported 42.6 per million   
   >> cases and 71.5 per million cases for 12-15 and 16-17-year-old males,   
   >> respectively, but now the health agency admits those incidence rates are   
   >> actually 150.5 per million for the younger group and 137.1 per million   
   >> for the older. Among 16- and 17-year-old males, the incidence rate jumps   
   >> to a whopping 188 per million following the first booster, with 9 of the   
   >> 47,874 developing heart inflammation in the week after that shot.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> While rates from the latest CDC study are “3-5 times higher for young men   
   >> than what the CDC was reporting this time last year,” other health   
   >> experts, whom the media discredited, were ahead of the curve. Data from a   
   >> study conducted by Tracy Hoeg, MD, Ph.D., and others in 2021 aligns with   
   >> the latest CDC numbers from 2022.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> The doctors reported a rate of 94 cases of “cardiac adverse events” per   
   >> million for 16-17-year-old males and 162 per million for 12-15-year-old   
   >> males. While this is compatible with the latest CDC study, the corporate   
   >> media and its fact-checkers labeled it misinformation when it was   
   >> published last year.   
   >>   
   >> Following the Hoeg study’s publication, the British Medical Journal   
   >> claimed critics called the study “deeply flawed” and said it delivered   
   >> “an antivaccine message.” PolitiFact reported that posts about   
   >> myocarditis risk on Facebook “were flagged as part” of the platform’s   
   >> “efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.” Big   
   >> Tech used these so-called fact-checks to censor good-faith Americans,   
   >> dissenting medical experts, and even lawmakers who questioned the CDC’s   
   >> vaccinations-for-all narrative.   
   >>   
   >> For example, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., was labeled “fundamentally   
   >> dangerous” in his efforts to let Americans discuss adverse reactions they   
   >> experienced after receiving Covid shots. The Wisconsin senator’s YouTube   
   >> channel was also temporarily suspended in November 2021 — for the fifth   
   >> time — after posting “a video of a panel on vaccine-related injuries”   
   >> that was deemed “Covid misinformation.” Yet adverse effects do occur, as   
   >> even the CDC has acknowledged, including the aforementioned vaccine-   
   >> associated myocarditis.   
   >>   
   >> Efforts to quash alternative research prevented members of the public   
   >> from considering this information, which would have allowed them to make   
   >> better-informed decisions about the Covid jab for themselves and their   
   >> children. As Hoeg wrote on Twitter, “If we hadn’t been vilified [sic] as   
   >> ‘anti-vaxxers’ spreading ‘mis’ & ‘disinformation’, how would the   
   >> conversation around minimizing the chance of this adverse event have   
   >> changed & how many cases of myo/pericarditis in young males would have   
   >> been prevented over the last year?”   
   >>   
   >> Concern about myocarditis was not the only Covid-related content to be   
   >> decried as “misinformation” and nuked from the public square though. The   
   >> corporate media, health bureaucrats, and even President Biden repeated   
   >> the narrative that Covid vaccines prevent the transmission of the virus.   
   >> In November 2021, USA Today ran an article stating, “vaccines work   
   >> against contracting, spreading Covid-19,” fact-checking social media   
   >> posts that raised concern about “whether the shots work[ed].” The   
   >> vaccine-hesitant and those who resisted sweeping mandates were smeared as   
   >> “anti-vaxxers.”   
   >>   
   >> But as The Federalist reported, the ruling regime was the real purveyor   
   >> of misinformation. In January 2022, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky   
   >> finally admitted on CNN that the vaccines can’t “prevent transmission.”   
   >>   
   >> Many pandemic concerns that were once labeled misinformation have since   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)