XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption
XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc
XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.poli
ics.socialism.mao
XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intellige
t-life.down-here, alt.politics.guns
XPost: alt.politics
From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov
On 9/26/22 2:01 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
> On 9/26/2022 10:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> OrigInfoJunkie wrote in
>> news:82kYK.688298$BKL8.299495@fx15.iad:
>>
>>> On 9/26/2022 8:48 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>> OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unbeatable
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
>>>>>>>>>>>> taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
>>>>>>>>>>>> now. ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
>>>>>>>>>>>> case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
>>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
>>>>>>>>>>>> will likely be instructed they can infer that when
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
>>>>>>>>>>>> adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
>>>>>>>>>>>> James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
>>>>>>>>>>>> will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
>>>>>>>>>>>> that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> questions he was asked. ...
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
>>>>>>>>>> one's enemies.
>>>>>>>>> No. That's not what's happening.
>>>>>>>> Oh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look at you, standing up for fraud.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at you, standing up for political persecution
>>>>>
>>>>> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
>>>>> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him
>>>>> accountable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
>>>> is now touting "no charges = no crime"?
>>>
>>> That's been their absurd gag for a long time. And then they threaten
>>> to riot and engage in insurrection at the mere thought of *bringing*
>>> charges against Trump. Here's how they think:
>>>
>>> "Trump hasn't been charged, so that 'means' he has committed no
>>> crime. But if he is charged, that will mean charges are being
>>> brought against an innocent man (because he hasn't been charged
>>> yet), and so if he is charged, we will riot and overthrow the
>>> government."
>>>
>>> That is *exactly* the (il)logic of the America-haters' so-called
>>> "thinking."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> If the FBI is investigating Hillary
>> that proves she is corrupt.
>>
>> If the FBI is investigating Trump
>> that proves THEY are corrupt.
>>
>> Even if the FBI Director is a
>> Trump appointee..........
>
> Excellent points.
>
>
You ignore the proof, the FBI said Hillary violated the law...
Then the Inspector General proved that the FBI fabricated and used fake
evidence to smear and try to entrap TRUMP.
--
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-
*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-
oter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
128 - If a marriage license/regulation can *NOT* tell you who *you*
*must* *engage* *in* *marriage* *with* depending on their race or sexual
identity how can a business license/regulation tell you *who* *you*
*must* *engage* *in* *commerce* *with* depending on their race or sexual
identity?
If one is Constitutional then the other must certainly be
unconstitutional because the two Supreme Court opinions contradict one
another. One says the power of the United States *can't* be use to
dictate who the license is used to engage in activities with, while the
other says the United States *has the power* to tell you who you must
use the license to engage in activities with.
*Democrat Policy is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
