Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,620 of 12,782    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to John Dillinger    |
|    Re: My decision to give away ownership o    |
|    22 Oct 22 12:04:27    |
      [continued from previous message]              They want to entrap you into their network of corruption, the Democrats       want to own you... the Democrats never outgrew their controlling nature       that caused them to create the Confederacy "Slave Union of the Southern       States" where they also tried to manipulate people into helping them get       what they wanted, and what the Democrats want is power over others.              The direct approach of PLANTATION SLAVERY failed with the DEMOCRAT       FOUNDED Confederacy, and now the Democrats are still trying to gain the       power to enslave people by corruption and coercion and.... propaganda       that tells you that *FRACTIONAL SLAVERY* like ObamaCare is NOT slavery       when the Constitution says it is.              The problem with that is that the 13th Amendment says it is.              Amendment XIII       Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a       punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,       shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their       jurisdiction.              Forcing "someone to give the profits from their labor" to "someone that       did not do the labor" is slavery.                     It doesn't matter whether it's the Government doing it by organizing       people into groups or whether it's a Plantation Owner doing it. It's       still SLAVERY TAKING PLACE within the United States.              And the 13th specifically says that unless the SLAVERY/SERVITUDE is for       *PUNISHMENT OF A CRIME* AND THE PARTY(not even a person or citizen) but       anyone "as in party" is duly convicted of a crime... only then can they       be taxed into slavery or otherwise forced to work to pay for someone       else to get the money. But the Government can't pass a law that makes it       a crime to NOT work for someone and be denied the RIGHT "to not give the       fruits of your own labor.              Which makes it Unconstitutional for the U.S. Government and all others       to take from one person to give to another as it also denies the       Government the power to tax from one person to give to another without       it being for the public use in general.              Which makes all Government TRANSFER PAYMENTS directly to people or       States, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.              And tax laws or other Federal laws can't violate that because the       Supremacy Clause lays out that the Federal law is supreme and if they       are denied power to make that Federal or State law as in the 13th       Amendment denying the power to take money from one person and give it to       another thereby enslaving the person doing the labor and rewarding the       one not doing the labor, it violates the qualifier in the 13th       Amendment, and that qualifier says the slavery/servitude has to be       PUNISHMENT FOR A CRIME for which THE PARTY HAS BEEN DULY CONVICTED.              *except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been*       *duly* *convicted, shall exist within the United States*              And no tax law or appropriations law can violate that Constitutional       restriction and MANDATE.              NOT even the United States Government can make persons slaves if we have       NOT been duly convicted of a crime.              WELFARE is a SLAVERY scam.              Charity which is voluntary is LEGAL, taxes and appropriations laws for       welfare and free stuff directly to people as transfer payments and to       States for transfer payments is Unconstitutional slavery being made       systemic slavery.              Welcome to Socialism, where mediocrity is the highest achievement possible.                     --       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       -That's Karma-              *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*       *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate       censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them       prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't       find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then       you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the       Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have       a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".       https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-       oter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html              *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is       207 - *DEMOCRAT POLICY FAILURE*              a.) You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the       wealthy out of prosperity.              b.) What one person receives without working for, another person must       work for without receiving. And that's the definition of SLAVERY              c.) The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government       does not first take from somebody else.              d.) You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!              e.) When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work       because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other       half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is       going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any       nation.              f.) You can't legislate gays to be equal by forcing store owners into       involuntary servitude and being less equal when obtaining a business       license. That violates the 13th amendment.              g.) If a marriage license/law can *NOT* tell you who *you* *must*       *engage* *in* *marriage* *with* depending on their sexual identity       (Because it's unconstitutional) how can a business license/law tell you       *who* *you* *must* *engage* *in* *commerce* *with* depending on their       sexual identity? Is it or isn't it UNCONSTITUTIONAL for government to       use a license/law to mandate or limit participation depending on sexual       identity...? The governments decisions can't flip flop depending on the       type of license.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca