XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   https://nworeport.me/2022/11/28/sen-murphy-calls-for-defunding-l   
   w-enforcement-who-refuse-to-enforce-gun-laws/   
   =================================================   
      
      
   There are no Constitutional gun laws on THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP   
   and BEAR ARMS.   
      
   *Amendment II*   
   A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free   
   State, *the right of the people to keep and bear Arms* , shall not be   
   infringed.   
      
   That "RIGHT to keep and bear" is sacrosanct.   
      
   It is NOT a power delegated to the United States and it is being DENIED   
   to the States by the FACT that the Amendment pronounces it THE RIGHT OF   
   THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, as a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE* , which   
   denied it as a power to the several or individual States. Expressed by   
   Amendment 10.   
      
   *Amendment X*   
   The powers *not delegated to the United States* by the Constitution, nor   
   *prohibited by it to the States* , *are reserved* to the States   
   *respectively* , or *to the people* .   
      
   Which leaves the RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR in the hands of "WE THE PEOPLE".   
      
      
   No State ban or Federal Ban is possible on any "arms".  And arms are   
   anything that has ever been issued as arms for self defense by the U.S.   
   Government and the U.S. Government is required to stop the States from   
   banning any "arms" that they have ever issue to their own employees   
   soldiers and personal security teams to use for their own protection...   
   because they are all arms that you can also KEEP and BEAR as your own   
   ARMS.   
      
   The list of arms is the LIVING HISTORY of ARMS, there is no room for   
   Government to infringe on that RIGHT. What has been done in the past by   
   the Government and will be done in the future when issuing arms as   
   personal protection equipment "a euphemism for arms" will join the list   
   of obviously acceptable arms, because what the government uses as arms   
   for personal protection is obviously "arms" and we have a RIGHT to keep   
   and bear those arms.  Others may need to be decided in courts if they   
   aren't and never were used or labeled as arms by the government.  Things   
   like hammers... are they tools or arms?   
      
   Pelosi being attacked by a gay prostitute with a hammer brings up the   
   question of was the crime of the Prostitute armed assault or just   
   assault?  Does having a hammer equate to being armed or is it a "WEAPON   
   of Convenience"?  I don't see a hammer as being protected by the RIGHT   
   to KEEP and BEAR ARMS. So how could the prostitute have been "armed"? He   
   was using a weapon of convenience to assault, essentially making it more   
   than a bare hand fist fight type of assault.   
      
      
      
   That's one for the courts.   
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)