home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,848 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to OrigInfoJunkie   
   Re: There is no "unorganized militia" (2   
   29 Nov 22 09:26:56   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   > intellectual betters will tell you what arms are within the limits of   
   > the right, scooter.   
      
      
   There are no limits on ARMS, and OUR omnipotent overlords have already   
   told us what "arms" are.  It's a matter of Precedence that all things   
   that they the Omnipotent OverLords might use in self defense is what we   
   can use, so if they issue it to Government persons and personnel as   
   personal protection in the past or present or future it is MOST   
   DEFINITELY what is called "arms" and then we have other things that also   
   define what they are like what a soldier carries for personal self   
   protection. What a hunter is armed with and carries for self protection.   
     And what a Government spy might use for personal protection or the   
   politicians require we pay for in arms for the personal security for   
   themselves.   
      
   You see the Government by their own hand have already declared far more   
   than the AR-15 as being "arms" and that is exactly what WE THE PEOPLE   
   have the RIGHT to KEEP AND BEAR AS ARMS. In FACT the BATF has declared   
   many things "arms" in the very language of the laws and regulations they   
   attempt claim are Constitutional, the irony is that when they called   
   them arms or suggest it's armed robbery or call it personal protection   
   it defined that object as "arms" so we now have well over 30,000 pages   
   of official legal documents claiming that things like an AR-15 is what   
   they call fire-"arms" as in arms that are protected by the U.S.   
   Constitution and arms that the Government issues to to people as   
   personal protection.  Making their laws and regulations a contradiction   
   of themselves.... because "arms" can't be regulated or banned when it   
   comes to keeping and bearing those arms as per Amendment 2. where it   
   says *the right of the people to keep and* *bear* *Arms* , *shall not*   
   *be* *infringed* .   
      
   Which means if the Government can issue it to a person to performs their   
   duty, it was is and always will be personal protection and what we all   
   call "arms".   
      
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca