Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,848 of 12,782    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to OrigInfoJunkie    |
|    Re: There is no "unorganized militia" (2    |
|    29 Nov 22 09:26:56    |
      [continued from previous message]              > intellectual betters will tell you what arms are within the limits of       > the right, scooter.                     There are no limits on ARMS, and OUR omnipotent overlords have already       told us what "arms" are. It's a matter of Precedence that all things       that they the Omnipotent OverLords might use in self defense is what we       can use, so if they issue it to Government persons and personnel as       personal protection in the past or present or future it is MOST       DEFINITELY what is called "arms" and then we have other things that also       define what they are like what a soldier carries for personal self       protection. What a hunter is armed with and carries for self protection.        And what a Government spy might use for personal protection or the       politicians require we pay for in arms for the personal security for       themselves.              You see the Government by their own hand have already declared far more       than the AR-15 as being "arms" and that is exactly what WE THE PEOPLE       have the RIGHT to KEEP AND BEAR AS ARMS. In FACT the BATF has declared       many things "arms" in the very language of the laws and regulations they       attempt claim are Constitutional, the irony is that when they called       them arms or suggest it's armed robbery or call it personal protection       it defined that object as "arms" so we now have well over 30,000 pages       of official legal documents claiming that things like an AR-15 is what       they call fire-"arms" as in arms that are protected by the U.S.       Constitution and arms that the Government issues to to people as       personal protection. Making their laws and regulations a contradiction       of themselves.... because "arms" can't be regulated or banned when it       comes to keeping and bearing those arms as per Amendment 2. where it       says *the right of the people to keep and* *bear* *Arms* , *shall not*       *be* *infringed* .              Which means if the Government can issue it to a person to performs their       duty, it was is and always will be personal protection and what we all       call "arms".                     --       -Reality Matters-              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca