home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,861 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to nickname unavailable   
   Re: If true then all Joe Biden needs to    
   30 Nov 22 13:44:11   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 11/30/22 11:46 AM, nickname unavailable wrote:   
   > On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode   
   > his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and   
   > lied:   
   >   
   >> On 11/30/22 10:36 AM, Paul Jackson wrote:   
   >>> On 11/30/2022 6:30 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>> scooter lied:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Michael A Terrell"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:rUqhL.9565$pem1.972@fx10.iad...   
   >>>>>> On 11/29/2022 6:25 AM, Scout wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Klaus  Schadenfreude"    
   >>>>>>> wrote in   
   >>>>>>> message news:4622oh9lm0sc4tjmhvsojtsg1p0mghhlb5@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:15:42 -0800, Rudy "Shitbag" Canoza   
   >>>>>>>> <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "Arms" means "weapons," of any kind.  Right-wingnuts in the USA   
   >>>>>>>>> insist -   
   >>>>>>>>> incorrectly, of course - that the second amendment, which   
   >>>>>>>>> addresses the "right to keep and bear arms," means *any* arms   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Wrong,   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No, right.  You crazed far-right squat-to-piss girly boy gun-fondling   
   >>>>>> morons believe, incorrectly, that the right means *any* arms you may   
   >>>>>> wish to have.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I think as an expert in what I believe, I can't help but feel I know   
   >>>>> that far better than you ever could.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>      OK, tell what you believe about   
   >>>> the constitutionality of gun laws.   
   >>>   
   >>> scooter believes any gun laws that restrict his access to guns he   
   >>> wishes to have are unconstitutional.   
   >>   
   >> the RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.   
   >   
   >       Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is   
   >       *not unlimited*. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases,   
   >       commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was   
   >       not a right to keep and carry *any weapon whatsoever* in any   
   >       manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.   
   >       [emphasis added]   
   >   
   >       DC v Heller, 2008   
   >   
   > You don't have a right to just whatever arms you wish.   
      
   Arms and "weapons" are NOT the same. the United States issues arms to   
   their employees at the IRS/CBP FBI/CIA Secret Service and more.   
      
   Those "arms" all of them... any arms are THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP   
   AND BEAR.   
      
   I don't see weapons in the RIGHT to keep and bear.   
      
   > This is settled.  Even scooter agrees with it.   
      
   The Constitution is the ONLY settled thing... and the Constitution was   
   amendment by the 2nd amendment to deny the RIGHT/POWER to to make laws   
   infringing on that RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE... what ever that RIGHT is.   
      
   And by my estimation that RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR ARMS, includes all   
   "arms" for which there is no list or specific Government knowledge of   
   what is or isn't in the category of "arms".  In FACT the list obviously   
   includes all the arms that the United States has tried to ban as   
   "FIREARMS" along with all the ones they call firearms or arms or   
   personal protection for their government employees and politicians and   
   their private sector FAMILY MEMBERS and "PARTNERS".   
      
   But doesn't end with that group of arms, those are simply the obvious   
   ones that show *Democrat Policy is unsustainable, self destructive and*   
   *contradicting* because they call them "arms" in their legal and   
   government documents and then ignore THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND   
   BEAR ARMS, and commence to banning or limiting restricting or regulating   
   those arms.   
      
   It's another obvious contradiction in logic, since there is no delegated   
   power to make laws to infringe on that RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE.   
      
   Why hasn't Joe Biden told us which arms the United States government   
   calls arms in their own attempt to ban them, are NOT arms and can be   
   regulated and banned by his delegated Constitutional powers?  I'm all   
   ears...   
      
   If they have a serial number then the ATF, FBI the rest of government   
   describe them as firearms... but as we all know it's THE RIGHT OF THE   
   PEOPLE to keep and bear that which is known in reality to be "arms".   
      
   SO quickly renaming arms to other categories won't change the fact that   
   the United States issued arms to the people that that work for the U.S.   
   GOVERNMENT. to use for self defense and protecting the government   
   offices and politicians and their families which makes them all arms   
   going by the 250 years of precedence set by the government use of arms.   
      
   See how changing history and tradition changes you and your life to a   
   FAKE existence... will undermine reality.   
      
      
   https://youtu.be/afGz0dzVSIU?t=145   
      
   Obama (Marxists) say you will have to change your *traditions* and your   
   *history* . But are you still "American" if Obama (Marxists) force you   
   to change "who we are by erasing who we were"?  The good the bad or the   
   ugly it's all reality, Marxist propaganda isn't reality.   
      
   What happens to all those Precedence setting court cases that are no   
   longer a precedence when lost to history? What about the Democrats   
   Confederacy created to make slave States permanent, or pushing to end   
   the Democrats JIM CROW LAWS... that was a Precedence setting case that   
   we will have to change?   
      
   NO we have Precedence setting cases for a reason... it's so we remember   
   and we need to remember that the United States Government has been   
   issuing arms to soldiers and Government employees and all those are   
   listed as arms and paid for with tax dollars to the Fire-arms   
   MANUFACTURERS who make and call them arms.   
      
   Yes the AR-15 and M-16 are arms and the IRS and Treasury and Defense   
   Departments pay with tax dollars to companies that manufacture firearms   
   and sell them as arms, so either they are arms or the TREASURY and the   
   Pentagon has been committing fraud by buying illegal weapons and calling   
   them arms or the Congress and States ban all those weapons illegally and   
   unconstitutionally from THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS.   
      
      
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca