XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/2/22 6:41 PM, -hh wrote:   
   > On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 4:10:07 PM UTC-5, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:17:41 -0800 (PST), -hh says...   
   >>>> What? Everything about Patrick Moore is true. You have something else to   
   talk   
   >>>> about... start your own thread.   
   >>>   
   >>> I?ve seen puffed up résumé?s.. is this one too? How would you know it?s   
   not?   
   >>   
   >> You are free to refute ANY of what was posted. It was not taken off a   
   résumé,   
   >> Mr. Pedantic. They are facts as his EMPLOYERS noted.   
   >   
   > Oh, his “EMPLOYERS”?  So much for him being a credibly independent voice.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>> the OP failed to provide a clear URL link to the original source   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Original source for?   
   >>>   
   >>> What you obviously grabbed from someplace.   
   >> About what? You keep speaking in tongues, that no one can decipher. Original   
   >> source for WHAT?   
   >   
   > It’s obvious that you didn’t write it yourself, and you’ve avoided   
   taking credit for writing it.   
   >   
   >> Keep going circular, and buh bye.   
   >   
   > Translation:  putting on your running cleats to prepare to duck & run.   
   >   
   >>>> If it has been quoted, it can be looked up.   
   >>>   
   >>> Ar claiming this is all your original work, and not a copy-paste grab?   
   >> What the fuck is your problem, psycho? Do you know every fact and figure on   
   who   
   >> or what YOU post about?   
   >   
   > Of course not, but I do know to attribute that which I’ve quoted.   
   >   
   >> I wish I had your brain.   
   >   
   > To borrow from the Grinch, your cranium is three sizes too small.   
   >   
   >>>> Are you serious? Are you a narcissist, who think that "old men" can't   
   think   
   >> any   
   >>>> moore?   
   >>>   
   >>> I understand physiology.   
   >> Oh, yu mean like when someone says Biden's lost his mind? No. Difference.   
   >   
   > Close.  Fortunately, much of what Biden has to work with has a lower rate   
   > of change, so it’s less stress to maintain currency.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> So, when Einstein turned 75, he was thrown in a bin, never to be believed   
   >> again?   
   >>   
   >> Claude Lévi-Strauss lived for 100 years. At 75, he was a forgotten man?   
   >>   
   >> So... ALL of these scientists... when they turned 75 or younger, they were   
   NOT   
   >> to be listened to?   
   >   
   > Think Einstein ever learned how to program the time on his VCR?   
   >   
   >> You truly are fucked in the head.   
   >   
   > The same head you’ve expressed jealousy of not having.   
   >   
   >>> People tend to get complacent with age   
   >>   
   >> Patrick Moore is active EVERY day.   
   >   
   > You troll daily too.  Proves nothing on credibility.  Or cognition.   
   >   
   >> He argues points EVERY day. He shows idiots   
   >> like you, how idiotic you are EVERY day.   
   >   
   > I read some of his tweets.  TL;DR is “nope”.   
   >   
   >>> them not keeping up to pace as much with change. Areas of high rates   
   >>> of change accentuates this tendency. As I went on to state:   
   >>   
   >> Dude... you are fucked in the head. I already knew this from your past   
   posts,   
   >> but you are showing everyone now, what kind of idiot you are.   
   >   
   > Ad hominem fallacy attempt.   
   >   
   >> Give it up. You have NO argument against Patrick Moore's credentials, JUST   
   >> because you may not agree with him.   
   >   
   > Why should I give up when you show how terrified you are of having even   
   > but one mere straightforward test of his credibility?   
   >   
   >   
   >> Desperate is as desperate does.   
   >   
   > Which describes you quite well.   
   >   
   >>>> Trust me... he keeps up. He's 75, not 95.   
   >>>   
   >>> Trust? Bullshit. Then let?s see you quote him, with cite, on how he?s   
   >>> addressed this specific point that I raised:   
   >> Do it yourself, liberal.   
   >   
   > Dishonest attempt to dodge & evade simple truths, as illustrated by how you   
   can’t   
   > even tolerate leaving the question in the quote, so you silently snipped it:   
   >   
   > “ Moore declared “impossible”, but technological advances have already   
   reduced the   
   > capital infrastructure costs of green generation in roughly the past decade   
   by 90%.   
   > Plus that cost trend is continuing. So where does he acknowledge this?”   
   >   
   > Why are you so afraid of even but one straightforward credibility test?   
   >   
   >> I'm done with you. Who let you in the fucking door anyways? All this was   
   >> addressed to Rudy.   
   >   
   > If you had a brain, you’d understand that’s a stupid question because   
   its a public newsgroup.   
   >   
   >> Don't bother responding, since you can't seem to handle anything on your   
   own.   
   >   
   > Cry harder.  Run like the scalded cat you are.   
      
   Credentials no longer account for anything but your willing submission   
   to the Marxists in power...  Credentials don't back up someones   
   competence because in a Marxist/Communist all that is ever backed up   
   with their fake bureaucratic credentials is your loyalty to the   
   Marxist/Communist party in power.   
      
   Which actually just means the only credentials that you can get that are   
   believable is the Marxist Communist Party credential that prove you are   
   CORRUPT to the core.   
      
   Which is why I will never do business or trust the LEFTIST of the   
   LEFTIST ideologies.   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   -That's Karma-   
      
   *IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*   
   *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate   
   censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them   
   prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't   
   find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then   
   you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the   
   Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have   
   a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".   
   https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-   
   oter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html   
      
   *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is   
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p58KzMMpILY   
   Clinton Explains why he launched attack on Iraq and Saddam Hussein.   
   *A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER*   
   Saddam was a terrorist Bill Clinton tells you the TRUTH.   
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mpWa7wNr5M   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)