[continued from previous message]   
      
   illness.  Because it isn't like RACE/GENDER where it's in the DNA and is   
   protected by the equal protection clause for all persons.   
      
      
   > Those race-based examples could get particular attention on a court   
   > with two Black justices, Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson,   
   > who are married to white spouses and another justice, Amy Coney   
   > Barrett, who has two adopted children who are Black. But the states   
   > gave an example involving a person's national origin too. "A tattoo   
   > studio could ink American flag tattoos on customers born in the United   
   > States while refusing to sell identical tattoos to immigrants," they   
   > said.   
   >   
      
   It was on purpose they used that but it's superfluous BS since DNA shows   
   race as part of all person's genetic material.  Gays are NOT and TRANS   
   are not, so they are NOT real except in the gays/trans minds.   
      
   All races are protected by the equal protection clause to equal   
   government access.   
      
   Which means that any store business or person that can't meet those   
   standards set by government for it's own participation in equal   
   protection of persons will have to be denied access to government   
   resources that their store doesn't meet the required equal access to   
   ensure the Government isn't violating the equal protection clause.   
      
      
      
   > Brianne Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center,   
   > representing a group of law professors, hypothesized other examples of   
   > what could happen if Smith succeeds at the high court.   
   >   
   > "A web designer could refuse to create a web page celebrating a female   
   > CEO's retirement - violating Colorado's prohibition on sex   
   > discrimination - if he believed all women have a duty to stay home and   
   > raise children. Similarly, a furniture-maker - who considers his   
   > furniture pieces to be artistically expressive - could refuse to serve   
   > an interracial couple if he believed that interracial couples should   
   > not share a home together. Or an architect could refuse to design a   
   > home for an interfaith couple," she told the court.   
   >   
   > Smith's supporters, however, among them 20 mostly Republican-leaning   
   > states, say ruling against her has negative consequences, too. A   
   > lawyer for the CatholicVote.org education fund told the court that if   
   > the lower court ruling stands and Smith loses, "a Jewish choreographer   
   > will have to stage a dramatic Easter performance, a Catholic singer   
   > will be required to perform at a marriage of two divorcees, and a   
   > Muslim who operates an advertising agency will be unable to refuse to   
   > create a campaign for a liquor company."   
   >   
   > The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty put it differently, telling   
   > the court that a Jewish baker could have to fulfill the request of a   
   > Neo-Nazi who wants a cake saying "Happy November 9th!" - a reference   
   > to Kristallnacht, the night in 1938 when Nazis burned synagogues and   
   > vandalized Jewish businesses throughout Germany and Austria.   
   >   
   > Alan B. Morrison, a constitutional law expert at Georgetown   
   > University, underscored that Smith doesn't currently do wedding   
   > websites, making the case particularly speculative and, he says,   
   > problematic. Still, Morrison chuckled at some of the hypothetical   
   > scenarios both sides came up with, suggesting they are "a bit   
   > overblown."   
   >   
      
      
   Overblown is a good way to describe it.  Government is the one being   
   regulated by the "equal protection clause" NOT the private sector's   
   commerce.   
      
   The over lap is when the Government injects its self into private sector   
   commerce with tax dollars and special indemnity clauses and Contracts   
   for private sector services.   
      
      
      
   > The examples, he said, are "the kind of thing a law professor would   
   > think of."   
      
      
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)