XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption
XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc
XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.poli
ics.socialism.mao
XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intellige
t-life.down-here, alt.politics.guns
XPost: alt.atheism
From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov
On 12/7/22 2:45 AM, Jay Santos wrote:
> On 12/6/2022 6:36 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Mitchell Holman wrote in
>> news:XnsAF65868CA3C24noemailcomcastnet@69.80.102.51:
>>
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote
>>> in news:554voh1r45u210md0omv872got0qr5a54g@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A well regulated Militia,
>>>
>>>
>>> what does "regulated" mean to you?
>>>
>>
>> Well, "Klaus"?
>>>
>>>
>>>> being necessary to the security of a free
>>>
>>> Nothing about personal self defense
>>>
>>
>> Well, "Klaus"?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> State, the right of the people
>>>
>>>
>>> What people? Women? Children?
>>> Freed felons? People with criminal
>>> convictions?
>>>
>>
>> Well, "Klaus"?
>>
>>>
>>>> to keep and bear Arms,
>>>
>>>
>>> What arms? Stinger missles
>>> Grenade launchers? RPG's?
>>>
>>
>> Well, "Klaus"?
>>>
>>>
>>>> "shall not be
>>>> infringed.
>>>
>>> What is an "infringemnt"?
>>
>>
>> Well, "Klaus"?
>
> This last one is pretty simple. An infringement is if you can't get
> arms. If you can get arms, but
>
> * there's a slight delay
> * you have to submit to a background check
> * there is some other administrative overhead
> * you can't get just whatever arms you wish
> * you can't brandish or "bear" the arms in whatever manner you wish
>
> then there has been no infringement.
>
> This is settled.
>
It means the arms that are arms are all available to you because the
U.S. government, and State government has no delegated power and is
denied the power to make laws to regulate this RIGHT, due to their
having ZERO constitutional powers to make laws that regulate or ban the
RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms.
And that's just the limitation on the GOVERNMENT for that RIGHT/POWER.
There is also a possibility of some other delegated power that could be
applied should the government want to make a law that would suppress
those rights or infringe on them. Which is why the 2nd Amendment also
says "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" so not only doesn't the government have
the delegated or inherent States power to make laws about the RIGHT to
KEEP and BEAR but also nothing about the "ARMS" themselves that the
people are going to keep and bear, but "shall not be infringed, stops
the attempt to use other delegated powers that have been delegated for
other uses from being used to infringe on *the RIGHT of the people* .
*Amendment II*
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, *shall not be*
*infringed* .
*the right of the people to keep and bear Arms* denies the delegated
power and *shall not be infringed* denies any attempt by anyone to claim
that they can limit or regulate that RIGHT, through a back door Clause
or Amendment... that allows powers for other things, but if applied to
the RIGHT to keep and bear arms... they would be infringing on that
RIGHT of the people.
NO laws to ban you from keeping nd bearing arms because you didn't pay
the tax stamp to own one...
or because you're a female... or you live on the wrong side of the
tracks. Or you didn't donate to the Democrat candidates.
--
-Reality Matters-
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
