XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/8/22 10:58 AM, Robert Gowan wrote:   
   > On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode   
   > his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and   
   > lied:   
   >   
   >> On 12/7/22 11:32 PM, Richard Clayton Wieber wrote:   
   >>> On 12/7/2022 6:11 AM, scooter lied:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Bud Dickmann"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:S8NjL.11388$8_id.4762@fx09.iad...   
   >>>>> On 12/6/2022 11:20 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>> Klaus  Schadenfreude    
   >>>>>> wrote   
   >>>>>> in news:554voh1r45u210md0omv872got0qr5a54g@4ax.com:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia,   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      what does "regulated" mean to you?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It means subjected to training.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> or properly working, like a well regulated clock.   
   >>>   
   >>> "subjected to training" will do, scooter.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>       Nothing about personal self defense   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How can anyone defend others if they can't even defend themselves?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> The second amendment is not about enabling anyone to defend himself,   
   >>> scooter.   
   >>   
   >> The Constitution works in its entirety, as a single Documen   
   >   
   > More worthless ignorant prattle from a brain-damaged fucktard about   
   > stuff he knows nothing about.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>> It is only about ensuring that southern slave patrols — the *only*   
   >>> use for the militia — could continue.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> While interesting speculation, the document   
   >   
   > We're talking *only* about the purpose of one amendment.  The purpose of   
   > it was to ensure armed slave patrols could continue.  That's all the   
   > authors and promoters of the amendment cared about.   
   >   
   You're discussing a CONSPIRACY THEORY...  That the 2nd Amendment is   
   there due to Democrats forefathers who supported Slavery.   
      
   Wait a minute, now that I read that slowly and out-loud, sounding out   
   the really BIG WORDS...?  You may have a point, it does sound like a   
   Democrat conspiracy that tracks back to the ORIGINAL SLAVERS who were   
   wolves in sheep's clothing, and keep shape shifting into different FAKE   
   GROUPS (DEMOCRATS ONE DAY and PROGRESSIVES and MARXISTS the next day and   
   today they're WEF and ONE WORLD SLAVERS) so they can hide from justice.   
      
   What will they morph into tomorrow, to hide from justice?   
      
   That's like the best *Conspiracy Theory* ever...   
      
   You are good.   
      
   Of course the Democrats in all their morphed forms are the same SLAVERS   
   they were in 1776 right? The one constant is the pursuit of SLAVERY...   
   DEMOCRATS or CONFEDERATES or FOUNDERS or what ever they call themselves   
   throughout time, are always leading that pursuit aren't they?   
      
   Look and ye shall find...   
      
   Taking guns away from SLAVES is what Democrats do, and if Democrats want   
   to take my guns it defines who the slavers are and who they intend to   
   enslave.... doesn't it?   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)