Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,962 of 12,782    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to Leroy N. Soetoro    |
|    Re: U.S. Supreme Court to consider prohi    |
|    11 Dec 22 05:24:42    |
      XPost: law.court.federal, alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption       XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc       XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.poli       ics.socialism.mao       XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy       XPost: alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intellige       t-life.down-here, alt.politics.guns       From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov              On 12/10/22 3:35 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:       > https://news.yahoo.com/u-supreme-court-consider-prohibition-213834055.html       >       > (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a bid by       > President Joe Biden's administration to revive a federal law that makes it       > a criminal offense to encourage illegal immigration after it was struck       > down by a lower court as a violation of free speech rights.       >       > The justices took up the administration's appeal of a February ruling by       > the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidating the       > law for infringing on rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution's       > First Amendment.       >       > The 9th Circuit's ruling threw out part of the conviction of a California       > man, Helaman Hansen, who had been prosecuted under the law.       >       > The dispute is similar to one that the Supreme Court heard, but did not       > resolve, in 2020.       >       > The federal government accused Hansen of deceiving undocumented immigrants       > between 2012 and 2016 by promising them that they could gain U.S.       > citizenship through an "adult adoption" program operated by his       > Sacramento-based business, Americans Helping America Chamber of Commerce.       >       > The government said Hansen persuaded at least 471 people to join his       > program, charging them each up to $10,000 even though he "knew that the       > adult adoptions that he touted would not lead to U.S. citizenship."       >       > Hansen was convicted in 2017 of violating provisions of the federal law       > that bars inducing or encouraging noncitizens "to come to, enter, or       > reside" in the United States illegally, as well as mail fraud and wire       > fraud and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.       >       > On appeal, the 9th Circuit in February ruled that the encouragement law is       > unconstitutional because it is overly broad and criminalizes even       > commonplace speech that is protected by the First Amendment, such as       > telling undocumented immigrants, "I encourage you to reside in the United       > States," or advising them about available social services.       >       > The 9th Circuit upheld Hansen's other convictions and ordered that he be       > resentenced.       >       > Biden's administration urged the Supreme Court to hear the case, faulting       > the appeals court for invalidating an "important tool for combating       > activities that exacerbate unlawful immigration."       >       > The case will be heard during the court's current term, with a ruling due       > by June 2023.       >       > (Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Sandra Maler)       >       > Comments:       >       > elenasand       > 21 hours ago       >       > "Prohibition" - In what direction are we going here? We have laws on the       > books that JUST NEED TO BE FOLLOWED AND ENFORCED. I know, I grew up in a       > "border state", it used to work. Law and order is just that, we are       > already paying for the "law" part, now it's their job to maintain "order".                     It seems redundant to pass a law that says that the government has to       obey the laws that have already been passed for government to follow.              Wouldn't it simply be better to pass a law that says that all laws       broken by Government workers and elected persons has to be taken to an       Impeachment and trial by an advocate from a political party other than       their own and has a minimum of 6 months in jail if convicted of any crime.              --       -Reality Matters-              https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twi       ter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/       -------------------------------------------------------              And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the       SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.              They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW*       *GOVERNMENT* .              For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat*       *territory* ...you better stock up on tinfoil.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca