home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,962 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to Leroy N. Soetoro   
   Re: U.S. Supreme Court to consider prohi   
   11 Dec 22 05:24:42   
   
   XPost: law.court.federal, alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption   
   XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.poli   
   ics.socialism.mao   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intellige   
   t-life.down-here, alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/10/22 3:35 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:   
   > https://news.yahoo.com/u-supreme-court-consider-prohibition-213834055.html   
   >   
   > (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a bid by   
   > President Joe Biden's administration to revive a federal law that makes it   
   > a criminal offense to encourage illegal immigration after it was struck   
   > down by a lower court as a violation of free speech rights.   
   >   
   > The justices took up the administration's appeal of a February ruling by   
   > the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidating the   
   > law for infringing on rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution's   
   > First Amendment.   
   >   
   > The 9th Circuit's ruling threw out part of the conviction of a California   
   > man, Helaman Hansen, who had been prosecuted under the law.   
   >   
   > The dispute is similar to one that the Supreme Court heard, but did not   
   > resolve, in 2020.   
   >   
   > The federal government accused Hansen of deceiving undocumented immigrants   
   > between 2012 and 2016 by promising them that they could gain U.S.   
   > citizenship through an "adult adoption" program operated by his   
   > Sacramento-based business, Americans Helping America Chamber of Commerce.   
   >   
   > The government said Hansen persuaded at least 471 people to join his   
   > program, charging them each up to $10,000 even though he "knew that the   
   > adult adoptions that he touted would not lead to U.S. citizenship."   
   >   
   > Hansen was convicted in 2017 of violating provisions of the federal law   
   > that bars inducing or encouraging noncitizens "to come to, enter, or   
   > reside" in the United States illegally, as well as mail fraud and wire   
   > fraud and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.   
   >   
   > On appeal, the 9th Circuit in February ruled that the encouragement law is   
   > unconstitutional because it is overly broad and criminalizes even   
   > commonplace speech that is protected by the First Amendment, such as   
   > telling undocumented immigrants, "I encourage you to reside in the United   
   > States," or advising them about available social services.   
   >   
   > The 9th Circuit upheld Hansen's other convictions and ordered that he be   
   > resentenced.   
   >   
   > Biden's administration urged the Supreme Court to hear the case, faulting   
   > the appeals court for invalidating an "important tool for combating   
   > activities that exacerbate unlawful immigration."   
   >   
   > The case will be heard during the court's current term, with a ruling due   
   > by June 2023.   
   >   
   > (Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Sandra Maler)   
   >   
   > Comments:   
   >   
   > elenasand   
   > 21 hours ago   
   >   
   > "Prohibition" - In what direction are we going here? We have laws on the   
   > books that JUST NEED TO BE FOLLOWED AND ENFORCED. I know, I grew up in a   
   > "border state", it used to work.  Law and order is just that, we are   
   > already paying for the "law" part, now it's their job to maintain "order".   
      
      
   It seems redundant to pass a law that says that the government has to   
   obey the laws that have already been passed for government to follow.   
      
   Wouldn't it simply be better to pass a law that says that all laws   
   broken by Government workers and elected persons has to be taken to an   
   Impeachment and trial by an advocate from a political party other than   
   their own and has a minimum of 6 months in jail if convicted of any crime.   
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twi   
   ter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/   
   -------------------------------------------------------   
      
   And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the   
   SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.   
      
   They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW*   
   *GOVERNMENT* .   
      
   For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat*   
   *territory*  ...you better stock up on tinfoil.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca