XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   https://nworeport.me/2022/12/11/senate-democrats-hatch-plan-to-s   
   bsidize-abortion-travel-during-the-lame-duck-session/   
   ------------------------------------------------------   
      
   If abortion is a "Religious Subject" that crazy religious people have as   
   part of a faith based religious belief, why do Democrat tell us it is,   
   and then tell us it's legally based in science and that the secular   
   science and logic has the evidence to prove it's NOT a religious belief   
   but that they have the science to prove that the human life in the   
   uterus is NOT a "live human" from conception, according to science....   
      
   Then how can Democrats start by saying religious wackos believe and then   
   they later claim that they can subsidize the antithesis of that   
   religious belief with TAX DOLLARS and violate the "Congress shall make   
   no law" clause on religion. Isn't that GOVERNMENT declaring that their   
   government beliefs of RELIGION shows other religions are false religions   
   unless they agree with the Government's religious belief, without any   
   science or facts or logic to support that government claim their claim   
   is a belief and it's selecting a religious belief to support?   
      
   To spend tax money requires a law. And Congress can make no law that   
   undermines any religion and thereby is elevating some other religion to   
   become the officially accepted Government religious belief.   
      
   If the government were to present facts in court proving that it's NOT   
   spending money on a "religious" belief by proving that the human life in   
   the uterus is NOT in fact a human life in the uterus that is protected   
   by the 5th Amendment or the 13th Amendment due process or Duly Convicted   
   clauses using facts and evidence, they would win the Supreme court case   
   that it's NOT a conspiring to commit murder and using tax dollars to   
   execute a human life which is protected by due process and that prevents   
   the government from engaging in funding any part of the execution of   
   that life since it committed no crime and has not received due process.   
   And as a religious belief that the human life is alive from conception   
   is as valid as the government's unfounded assumption and belief that   
   there is NO life after conception, until birth.   
      
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twi   
   ter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/   
   -------------------------------------------------------   
      
   And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the   
   SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.   
      
   They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW*   
   *GOVERNMENT* .   
      
   For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat*   
   *territory*  ...you better stock up on tinfoil.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)