home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,966 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to D. Ray   
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_TroonFight=3a_Musk_and_h   
   13 Dec 22 13:20:40   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.politics.libertarians   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/13/22 5:47 PM, D. Ray wrote:   
   > …   
   >   
   > Elon Musk has the exact same “incitement to violence,” rhetoric that   
   antifa   
   > uses. If you make him want to do violence to you when you post something   
   > that is clearly not calling for violence, well now that’s just incitement   
   > to violence and you need to be banned. I recommend watching the entire 22   
   > second video to see his weird impotent fake tough guy routine in action.   
   >   
   > It’s also worth mentioning that the above legitimate incitement to violence   
   > is still up on the twatters. Musk isn’t even consistent, he’s just a   
   > totally ADL-owned wimp who is doing the Finklethink routine, and not even   
   > particularly well.   
   >   
   > But even he’s got the trannies neo-vaginas in a tizzy, and in more than   
   > just one way.   
   >   
   > …   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >    
   >   
   What's the difference between incitement to violence and triggering   
   someone who then becomes violent..   
      
   And isn't the key word here that's common to it all "VIOLENCE" and what   
   is common to all violence is "DEMOCRATS" so when you follow the violence   
   it leads you the DEMOCRATS who are VIOLENT and blame you for triggering   
   them and inciting them to commit their violence...   
      
      
   The irony is that as DEMOCRATS always do, they are blaming you for their   
   ignorance and incompetence.   
      
   Because as we all know the Democrats didn't do anything, did they?  So   
   why would you lock them up in a prison to stop the violence? I think we   
   can all see that this is the point of all this is that "you need to be   
   locked up in prison and the VIOLENT DEMOCRATS should run free" it's   
   reparations for the VIOLENT DEMOCRATS being put in prisons for their   
   violent behavior.  They get to run wild and loot and pillage and steal   
   and burn and kill and get away with it because it's all your fault.   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twi   
   ter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/   
   -------------------------------------------------------   
      
   And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the   
   SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.   
      
   They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW*   
   *GOVERNMENT* .   
      
   For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat*   
   *territory*  ...you better stock up on tinfoil.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca