XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.politics.libertarians   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/13/22 8:31 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:   
   > https://nypost.com/2022/12/13/fighting-back-against-the-thuggish-esg-woke-   
   > agenda/   
   >   
   > There’s no such thing as blue money or red money. Only the green stuff   
   > will pay bills.   
   >   
   > On Friday, North Carolina Treasurer Dale Folwell became the latest of   
   > officials from nearly half the states across the country — including   
   > Florida, Texas, Kentucky, Missouri, Arizona and West Virginia — to protest   
   > Wall Street’s blue investment strategy, called ESG.   
   >   
      
      
   There is no ESG money in GOVERNMENT or connected to GOVERNMENT or the   
   laws they create.   
      
   it would be GOVERNMENT pushing their Cult religion of one WORLD   
   GOVERNMENT and the LGBTQ+ and the Pedophile and Abortion and human   
   sacrifice and Government planned death tenets of their religion.   
      
   And we already know that government can "make no law respecting an   
   establishment of religion" which means that imposing their Cults tenets   
   as laws is just as illegal as HUMAN sacrifice or any other religious   
   edict with TAX PAYER DOLLARS and that was the Democrats own   
   INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.   
      
   Which mean that NO government entity can invest or give money to or be   
   in business and or fund or invest or partner with or hire as   
   contractors, any religious order.   
      
   And we know the ESG's are working with and funding and promoting the   
   Cult religion tenets of LGBTQ and Pedophilia and killing of human life   
   with abortion, all religious Cult belief's and NOT connected to FACTS   
   and LOGIC and SCIENCE, the Religious order of WEF and One World Cults   
   connected to Democrats and ESG's that are connected to TRAN HUMANS and   
   TRANS GENDERS and gays and abortion and throwing a virgin into a volcano   
   and other Cult beliefs are NOT allowed to be turned into laws. It   
   violates the Constitution.   
      
   Amendment I   
   Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or   
   prohibiting the free exercise thereof;   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the   
   privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any   
   State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due   
   process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   It says right there that the government can't impose it's Cult belief's   
   on *We The People* by passing laws and to spend money or do business   
   with a religious entity/Cult would require a law allowing that money be   
   invested with an ESG that is directing the money in ways that promote   
   and establish the Religions and Cults and tenets of those religions   
   using the government laws.  And the CULT TENET of ESG is similar to the   
   Muslim religion's tenet of NOT borrowing money with an interest rate...   
      
   The government can make no law regarding it since it would be the   
   government attempting to establish that or deny that religion and the   
   government can't favor it's own religious tenets and make laws promoting   
   them. The government laws have to be based in fact logic and truth and   
   not based in faith and belief and the unproven.   
      
   Gays and Global Warming and TransGender and Critical Racial Theory are   
   tenets of a cult or of many cults combining together and are only   
   beliefs NOT proven science.  Laws based on their "beliefs" are NOT   
   Constitutional, as per Amendment I, Congress shall make no law   
   respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free   
   exercise thereof;   
      
   Laws have to be based on the Constitution NOT what people believe...   
      
   > What is ESG? E stands for environment, S for social justice and G for   
   > corporate governance. ESG funds invest in companies that oppose fossil   
   > fuels, push for unionization and stress racial and gender equity over   
   > merit in hiring and board selection.   
   >   
   > That’s a partial definition because at least a dozen rating firms tag   
   > companies with an ESG score, often based on subjective and somewhat secret   
   > criteria, even including a company’s stance on abortion rights.   
   >   
   > State officials are pulling billions of dollars out of Wall Street asset   
   > managers like BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, citing ESG’s lousy   
   > returns and strong-arming of corporations that don’t bow to the left-wing   
   > agenda.   
   >   
   > Pay attention to these officials’ warnings, because ESG is also hurting   
   > small investors. In fact, even if you don’t invest at all but you pay   
   > taxes, ESG puts you at risk. You’ll be on the hook when states invested in   
   > ESG funds incur losses and have to come to taxpayers for more money. New   
   > York City taxpayers, beware.   
   >   
   > Folwell calls ESG “wacktivism,” warning that “a focus on ESG is not a   
   > focus on returns.”   
   >   
   > Here’s proof: Bloomberg reported last week that eight of the 10 largest   
   > ESG funds by assets have underperformed the benchmark S&P 500 so far in   
   > 2022. The cost of being woke.   
   >   
   > It shouldn’t be a surprise. An August Harvard Law School Forum on   
   > Corporate Governance paper on ESG fund performance found no support for   
   > hyperbolic claims that investing in “social good” benefits the bottom   
   > line. Overall, it said, the relationship between ESG and financial   
   > performance is “uncertain.” Several studies it cited found ESG funds   
   > “underperform,” especially in market downturns. Like now.   
   >   
   > New York City has incurred sizable losses. Taxpayers will have to cough up   
   > billions to replenish the city’s retirement system, says city Comptroller   
   > Brad Lander. Instead of being remorseful, Lander is pressing Vanguard and   
   > BlackRock — the two biggest asset managers of city retirement funds — to   
   > double down on their climate commitments. Taxpayers can pound salt.   
   >   
   > It’s hard not to apply the word “scam” to aggressive ESG marketing,   
   > especially to millennials. Asset managers charge a whopping 40% more to   
   > manage money in these funds than non-ESG funds. For what? That’s the   
   > question the Securities and Exchange Commission is asking.   
   >   
   > “In response to investor demand, advisers like Goldman Sachs Asset   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)