XPost: alt.politics.org.fbi, alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption   
   XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.poli   
   ics.socialism.mao   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.politics.libertarians   
   XPost: alt.politics.media   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/18/22 5:17 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:   
   > https://nypost.com/2022/10/19/its-been-two-years-since-51-intelligence-   
   > agents-interfered-with-an-election-they-still-wont-apologize/   
   >   
   > Exactly two years ago, on October 19, 2020, one of the dirtiest tricks in   
   > electoral history was played on the American people by 51 former   
   > intelligence officials, who used the false alarm of “Russian   
   interference”   
   > to stop Donald Trump winning a second term as president.   
   >   
      
      
   Democrats who colluded with the Intelligence Agencies supported and   
   distributed the *DISINFORMATION* being spread by those attempting a Coup   
   D`etat via stealing an election to steal the political power and   
   undermine the U.S. Constitution... it was actual TREASON by the   
   Intelligence Officials who attempted to use lies and ballot fraud and   
   theft and buying ballots... Along with censorship of the NEWS MEDIA to   
   hide the REAL FACTS.   
      
      
   > Using the institutional weight of their former esteemed roles, they signed   
   > a dishonest letter to mislead voters 15 days before the election, claiming   
   > that material from Hunter Biden’s laptop published by the New York Post   
   > “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”   
   >   
   > In their expert opinion, “the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden   
   > email issue.”   
   >   
   > Russia was “trying to influence how Americans vote in this election …   
   > Moscow [will] pull out the stops to do anything possible to help Trump win   
   > and/or to weaken Biden should he win.   
   >   
   > “A ‘laptop op’ fits the bill, as the publication of the emails are   
   [sic]   
   > clearly designed to discredit Biden … It is high time that Russia stops   
   > interfering in our democracy.”   
   >   
   > It was all a lie. Their letter was the culprit “interfering with   
   > democracy” in broad daylight.   
   >   
   > Not one of the 51 had seen any material from the laptop or bothered asking   
   > for it, but their letter, instigated by, signed and delivered to Politico   
   > by Democratic operative and former John Brennan aide Nick Shapiro, killed   
   > the story stone dead. It got candidate Joe Biden off the hook for the   
   > corrupt influence-peddling scheme his family had been running through the   
   > eight years of his vice presidency.   
   >   
   > The shameful letter was used by Joe Biden three days later, on October 22,   
   > to deflect Trump’s attack in their last debate.   
   >   
   > “There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s   
   > accusing me of is a Russian plan … Four, five former heads of the CIA,   
   > both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage … You know his   
   > character. You know my character. You know my reputation is for honor and   
   > telling the truth … The character of the country is on the ballot.”   
   >   
   > Biden dismissed as a Kremlin smear all the evidence that was on his son’s   
   > laptop of dirty money from China and Russia, of all his meetings with   
   > Hunter’s overseas business partners, and all the lies he had told about   
   > his involvement in Hunter’s business deals.   
   > The letter, like the Steele dossier and Russia collusion hoax peddled by   
   > many of the signatories, has helped fuel a moral panic about Russia in   
   > recent years that now has heightened the risk of nuclear war.   
   >   
   > As well as sharing their Trump derangement, the Dirty 51 sit on the same   
   > boards and think tanks, speak at the same events or liberal TV shows,   
   > write for the same publications, pal around with the same journalists,   
   > retweet each other’s “Slava Ukraini” or Mar-a-Lago memes, share hawkish   
   > views about regime change in Russia and are remarkably sanguine about the   
   > prospect of nuclear war.   
   >   
   > You would think since so many have been outed for their involvement in the   
   > (non-existent) weapons-of-mass-destruction intelligence disaster that   
   > justified the Iraq war, not to mention secret prisons, torture,   
   > warrantless eavesdropping and the bulk collection of Americans’ data, they   
   > might have learned some humility.   
   >   
   > But they’ve never apologized for those intelligence failures, so it’s   
   > hardly surprising they are unrepentant about lying to rig the 2020   
   > election.   
   >   
   > Yes, that letter from the Dirty 51 had “all the classic earmarks” of a   
   > disinformation operation, all right — one designed to ensure Joe Biden won   
   > the presidency. And it was essentially a CIA operation, considering 43 of   
   > the 51 signatories were former CIA.   
   >   
   > In the two years since, not one of them has admitted they are wrong.   
   >   
   > David Priess at least gets marks for subjecting himself to a cross-   
   > examination on Fox News one recent afternoon. He tried to defend the   
   > letter by saying people were too stupid to understand it. The letter was   
   > “still true” because it did not use the words “Russian d   
   sinformation,”   
   > but concocted the weasel phrase “earmarks of a Russian information   
   > operation.”   
   >   
   > He knows perfectly well that Biden and the media drew no distinction, that   
   > the letter he signed was used to censor and deride The Post’s accurate   
   > story and deny the American people the truth about one of the two   
   > candidates for president.   
   >   
   > “It’s not my fault if people don’t look up definitions,” Priess said,   
   > smirking. “Those words are still true. It has all the classic earmarks.”   
   >   
   > He has all the classic earmarks of a psychopath. Not saying he is, but   
   > just look at him. Nudge nudge, wink wink.   
   >   
   > Five former CIA directors signed the letter — Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta,   
   > John Brennan and Michael Morell (acting), and John McLaughlin (briefly   
   > acting) — as well as a former Director of National Intelligence, James   
   > Clapper, eight CIA intelligence officers, seven analysts, four chiefs of   
   > staff and assorted other former Washington intelligence community   
   > grifters.   
   >   
   > I asked the 20 most prominent signatories last week if they had any   
   > regrets: “As time has proven you wrong, do you have any apology or   
   > retraction you would like to make? Do you feel any responsibility for your   
   > letter adding to a moral panic about Russia which has heightened the   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)