XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   From: d@ray   
      
   Back when Musk’s announcement to acquire Twitter was still fresh, my   
   initial instinct at the time was to assume Musk had been selected as the   
   frontman selectively reforming the social media platform that had become   
   central to global, but mainly American, political discourse.   
      
   The need for this reform, and Musk as the face of it, was based on the   
   totality of current political trends including increased racial awareness   
   and consciousness of Jewish power structures in the body politic,   
   increasing political polarization, instability, and the politicization of   
   self-proclaimed sacrosanct institutions such as the ADL, Musk’s   
   professional history, and the financial backers of the deal.   
      
   My fear at the time was that the type of “reform” expressed by Musk   
   wasn’t   
   ever going to apply to those of us actually speaking truth to power; the   
   most important tenet of which was a promised return to upholding our   
   ostensible constitutional right to free speech, even if there were some   
   limitations with which we all agreed, i.e., threats and violence are beyond   
   reproach.   
      
   Even as it seems that this initial assumption continues to be validated by   
   new information on a daily basis, it was still prudent at the time to leave   
   a margin of error and return to the platform as a litmus test. The results   
   of the test(s) are in and it is now clear where ideological lines have been   
   drawn.   
      
   ADL Public Enemy No. 1: National Justice Party   
      
   Right out of the gate, members of the National Justice Party were cited as   
   a major threat by the ADL and we were immediately banned.   
      
   All appeal attempts for accounts, both new and old, terminate with the   
   following response from Twitter claiming the account had incited violence,   
   even as no such act has ever occurred. Twitter refuses to substantiate its   
   claim.   
      
   When replying to this message by asking Twitter to meet a basic standard of   
   providing evidence to back up their allegations, a second response informs   
   users that the request has been closed.   
      
   A new request asking for Twitter to cite evidence ends with the same canned   
   incitement to violence response. Lather, rinse, repeat.   
      
   If you are critical of Jews or Israel in any manner, right, left, or   
   otherwise, you will be jettisoned from the platform.   
      
   However, if you believe the moon landing is fake, Jennifer Aniston is   
   really a tranny, or the WEF stands at the nexus of the Schwabian   
   Illuminato-fascist nanobot world order, unfurl those stars and stripes   
   because your speech is free at last!   
      
   All of this brings my initial theory into a much sharper contrast as enough   
   of the “bloom” has now come off of the proverbial free speech rose for a   
   sobering closer look.   
      
   Jewish Problems:   
      
   - Frustration over free speech limitations is being expressed in   
   increasingly wider apolitical circles   
      
   - Years of over-zealous censorship had reached a point where grandmas were   
   being banned/doxxed en masse for advocating basic pro-life sentiments   
      
   - The vast majority of those banned were White and found common cause with   
   other “untouchables” on a decentralized patchwork of platforms over which   
   Jews exercise little or no control   
      
   - Untouchables were becoming “radicalized”, i.e., racially aware and   
   ultimately aware of Jewish power structures   
      
   - Less concerning, but also problematic, untouchables were quitting social   
   media altogether and realizing how much it actually robs them of their   
   lives. The like button and infinite scroll were both invented by Jews to   
   make social media more addictive.   
      
   Jewish Solutions:   
      
   - Peter Thiel/Larry Ellison financed Musk’s takeover of Twitter, chosen   
   because he lacked perceived baggage, but also because he’s deeply embedded   
   in their world, i.e., an original member of the so-called PayPal Mafia   
      
   - Generate hype and excitement with right-wing “untouchables” about a   
   Twitter/free-speech renaissance at the kickoff of the midterm elections and   
   close the deal one week before election day, thus animating disenchanted   
   leftists and inducing false hope amongst untouchable right-wingers   
      
   - Offer full amnesty for those who did not call for violence, though in   
   practice this was a decision made based on an ideological spectrum of   
   kosher vs anti-semite whereby Twitter, via the ADL, considers any criticism   
   of Jews to be an act of violence   
      
   - Begin a predictable Julian Assange-esque drip, drip, drip campaign of   
   Twitter documents on Fridays to drive engagement and a feeding frenzy of   
   conservative excitement over nothing-burgers   
      
   - Permit certain Gevalt Right members^W federal informants to return to the   
   platform to ensure they and their followers are just inside the kosher line   
   where they belong while restoring the nodes in Thiel’s Palantir panopticon   
      
   - Make a sweep of suspensions targeting antifa “journalists” who have   
   outlived their purpose for two reasons: Doxxing has lost its impact on   
   actual anti-semites who are not on the platform anyway and right-wingers   
   who have been brought back to the platform should not be targeted and   
   allowed to flourish   
      
   - Ban all posts advocating for third-party platforms so people they   
   “repatriated” remain on the platform   
      
   Musk: Should I Quit?   
      
   As of Sunday, Musk had posted a Twitter poll asking respondents for a   
   simple up or down vote on whether he should step aside as CEO of the   
   platform and that he would abide by the results of the poll.   
      
   I’m going to go ahead and speculate that Musk’s poll is nothing more than a   
   face-saving PR move for a decision that’s already been made. This way Musk   
   gets to pretend as though things went “off the rails” and pressure mounted   
   from Twitter’s board members and big investors, so he merely took a   
   principled tack and let Twitter decide his fate; stakeholder capitalism in   
   its more contrived form.   
      
   The new CEO then steps in with promises of reform, changes nothing   
   substantial, and only makes refinements to the existing model.   
      
   Or, alternatively, if the poll ends in a yes for Musk to remain, he can   
   continue executing the plan with a “mandate” from Twitter itself in hand.   
      
   Bottom Line   
      
   Whether Musk steps down as Twitter CEO or not, the over-arching objective   
   is to create a stabilized false political dialectic between kosher left and   
   kosher right that can be centrally managed on a single platform – centrally   
   managed from the standpoint of censorship, surveillance, deradicalization,   
   and management of American political discourse; candidates, issues,   
   propaganda, and above all else, a safe space for their Jewish lies to   
   metastasize.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)