home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 12,041 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to bruce bowser   
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Material_on_foreign_nati   
   15 Jan 23 11:08:56   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.politics.libertarians   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 1/15/23 9:23 AM, bruce bowser wrote:   
   > Did Biden have Nuke documents ! ! !  Nope.   
   >   
      
   Foreign NATIONS nuclear capabilities should be posted in the NYT when   
   out government has it.....   
      
   So that we all know how dangerous they are. Why would it be classified   
   when they can release it as a leak like they do our own secrets.   
      
   Other nations secrets aren't OUR NATIONAL SECURITY.  All we would need   
   to do is to keep using multiple sources of information to get their   
   secrets, which we need to do to verify that the secrets we get are real   
   and NOT disinformation...  and if you have disinformation on the other   
   nations nuclear then they expect us to leak it back to them which then   
   means they won't know whether we know it's a a diversion and false   
   information.   
      
   It's a great way to create doubt in the minds of the enemy and all the   
   United States has to do is tell the truth. And if they know it's   
   disinformation then the other NATIONS will have wanted it to be leaked   
   back to them so they can confirm that their bait has been taken by us...   
      
   And we do that by releasing all nuclear information from all the   
   intelligence we get from multiple sources.   
      
   Because if it's NOT from multiple sources then it can't be treated as   
   real... you know, like the TRUMP RUSSIA DOSSIER that was filled with spy   
   information thet the CIA nd FBI and FISA COURTS believed was real and as   
   we all know, only an idiot would belive governmnet intelligence that   
   they can't confirm from other sources ad evidence.   
      
   SO what we have is Governmnet employees handling classified intelligence   
   material and releasing it and NOT verifying it but then lying to us   
   about that leaked document without having that confirmation from   
   multiple sources.  What we have is a FAILED INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM that   
   wants to keep secrets to protect themselves from indictment for their   
   crimes.... rather than keep us secure from our enemies nuclear weapons.   
      
   Mar-A-Lago was a secure place when TRUMP was President and decided to   
   keep those documents, which was well within the DELEGATED POWERS OF A   
   U.S. PRESIDENT according the the U.S. Constitution.   
      
   --   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -   
   -Reality Matters-   
      
      
   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twi   
   ter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/   
   -------------------------------------------------------   
      
   And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the   
   SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.   
      
   They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW*   
   *GOVERNMENT* .   
      
   For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat*   
   *territory*  ...you better stock up on tinfoil.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca