XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.politics   
   From: noway@nowhere.com   
      
   On 7/16/2023 6:13 PM, Governor Swill wrote:   
   > On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 14:10:41 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth    
   wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 7/16/2023 1:41 PM, Governor Swill wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 12:51:13 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth    
   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> The justices split 4-2-3,   
   >>>   
   >>> Why not?  Conservatives - swing - liberals.   
   >>   
   >> OK. Fill in the names (see below for the full list).   
   >   
   > Cons: Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Breyer   
   > Libs: Sotomayor and Ginsburg   
   > Swing:  Roberts, Kennedy and Kagan   
   >   
   > What's my score?   
      
   Zero.   
      
   The 4: Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor   
   The 2: Breyer, Kagan   
   The 3: Scalia, Thomas, Alito.   
      
   >>>> with the 4 concluding lies are presumptively   
   >>>> protected speech (except in the cases mentioned above such as   
   >>>> defamation). The 3 concluded lies are presumptively unprotected speech   
   >>>> (except in controversial topics such as philosophy, religion, history,   
   >>>> the social sciences and the arts). The 2 gave the controlling opinion   
   >>>> which held there is no presumption either way and instead a balancing   
   >>>> test applies which compares the harm to censoring speech versus the harm   
   >>>> of not censoring it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What I found most interesting is which justices fit into which group.   
   >>>> Can you guess without looking (at the time, we had Roberts, Scalia,   
   >>>> Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan)?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)