XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message   
   news:XnsB0448655FE40Anoemailcomcastnet@69.80.101.48...   
   > "Scout"  wrote in news:u93hsl   
   > $18ttg$3@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >> news:f4k8bi91h2736f7poa1j0bbtfr38aq0v0n@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 13:41:48 -0600, Just Wondering  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On 7/16/2023 1:04 PM, Governor Swill wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I WANT the government to notify users and providers when they   
   >>>>> are being lied to about something as important as VOTING.   
   >>>>> The government is free to do that.  That's MORE free speech   
   >>>>to counter what government considers a lie. What government   
   >>>>CANNOT (and should not) do is to suppress such speech.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> In fact, in an ideal world, I'd WANT someone to fact check   
   >>>>> social media.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>>Again, publishing fact checking is fine and dandy.  What is   
   >>>>unconstitutional is to suppress someone's speech because you   
   >>>>think they got their facts wrong.   
   >>>   
   >>> Everybody makes mistakes.  A bigger concern is deliberate lies.   
   >>   
   >> And when the "fact checking" is the deliberate lie?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > Like the fact checking you did on   
   > your claim that your high school   
   > education was paid for by a   
   > government loan you took out at   
   > age 14?   
      
   Yea, and you totally ignored it..  and then reduced to fund obtaining the   
   level of proof you demanded.   
      
   You cough up the money.. you will get your proof.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)