Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,651 of 12,782    |
|    kenya today to All    |
|    FCC Commissioner: Why Is Facebook Censor    |
|    21 Oct 24 16:25:48    |
      XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.media, sac.politics       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics       From: kenya@today.com              Vice President Kamala Harris is shamelessly trying to run away from her       'Border Czar' responsibilities, often with the assistance of a compliant       'news' media, but that wasn't the only major job with which she's been       tasked in the Biden-Harris administration. The president also tapped       her to help lead and oversee a number of expensive 'green' and       infrastructure initiatives. On a costly plan to install new electric       vehicle chargers (Harris is suddenly pretending she has nothing to do       with EV mandates she has supported and co-sponsored), Politico described       its 'progress' in late 2023: "Congress at the urging of the Biden       administration agreed in 2021 to spend $7.5 billion to build tens of       thousands of electric vehicle chargers across the country, aiming to       appease anxious drivers while tackling climate change. Two years later,       the program has yet to install a single charger." This past summer, the       results were still embarrassing: "Just seven electric-vehicle charging       stations have begun operating with funding from a $5-billion US       government program created in 2021, marking “pathetic” progress, a       Democratic senator said on Wednesday."              That serves as a backdrop to a related matter on which Harris was       explicitly placed in charge. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr summarized       the issue in a recent Wall Street Journal op/ed, explaining how a       much-ballyhooed rural broadband project has utterly failed thus far, on       Harris' watch:              Kamala Harris lamented recently that “in America, it takes too long and       it costs too much to build.” She’s right. But she failed to mention that       those costly delays are a feature, not a bug, of her progressive       policies. Consider Ms. Harris’s record. In 2021 she agreed to lead the       administration’s $42 billion plan for expanding high-speed internet to       millions of Americans. That year, she tweeted that “we can bring       broadband to rural America today.” Today, nearly three years after       Congress passed the infrastructure bill that created the program, not       one home or business has been connected through it. The Biden-Harris       administration recently confirmed that construction projects won’t begin       until next year at the earliest, and in many cases not until 2026.              Instead of focusing on delivering broadband to unserved areas, the       administration has used the program to advance a wish list of political       goals. It has adopted regulations that include diversity, equity and       inclusion requirements, climate-change rules, price controls,       preferences for union labor, and schemes that favor government-run       networks. The administration has been handing out wins to favored       political groups rather than delivering results. Other factors have kept       Ms. Harris’s high-speed program in the slow lane. Testifying before a       congressional oversight committee, one state government official       described “a chaotic implementation environment” marked by        dysfunction”       and “delays.” The administration, she said, “has provided either no       guidance, guidance given too late, or guidance changing midstream.”              This is, of course, a poor reflection on the Biden-Harris       administration, an indictment of her leadership, and another example of       why bloated government programs are so often wasteful and useless. It       also begs the question of what, if anything, Harris has done well as       Vice President. But what makes this all worse is Commissioner Carr's       subsequent allegation that Facebook is censoring his accurate WSJ piece       as 'misinformation:'                     Facebook is now censoring the fact that VP Harris has failed to connect       even one person to the Internet despite leading the Administration’s $42       billion infrastructure plan for 1,000+ days. Facebook is labeling this       “false information,” not because anyone has been connected—no one       has—but because the government has been spending money while not       connecting anyone. Worse? The fact checker’s only sources are       Biden-Harris officials. I thought Zuckerberg promised Congress that it       had stopped censoring posts at the behest of the Biden-Harris       Administration...Here’s what VP Harris and Facebook don’t want you to       know: VP Harris has been leading the Administration’s $42 billion       program to expand Internet access to millions of Americans for 1,070       days. Zero people have been connected. Zero shovels worth of dirt have       even been turned.              A social media giant is suppressing accurate information, furnished by a       government official--deciding it's "false," based on the say-so of       other, favored government officials. That is unacceptable and       disturbing, but it can't be seen as terribly surprising at this point.       But for those who purport to care about democracy dying in darkness, and       'misinformation,' and transparency, how can this sort of thing be       justified or defended? Or is it an ends-justify-the-means gambit that       throttles or blocks unhelpful information (even if there's a dispute       about whether it's fully correct, or at least disputed, or lacking       context) right before an election? As for other elements of Harris'       record and worldview, this was revealing:              A number of people have pointed out this juxtaposition:              I'll leave you with some of the other interesting choices Harris and her       surrogates are making entering the final stretch of this high-stakes       campaign:              https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2024/10/21/fcc-commissio       er-why-is-facebook-censoring-accurate-information-about-kamala-harris-n2646479              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca