XPost: alt.anonymous, alt.privacy.anon-server   
   From: bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru   
      
   A pretty much lying Fritz Wuehler user wrote:   
   > Nomen Nescio  wrote:   
   > > On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan  posted some   
   > > news:1761435073483161656.ac@radio-eriwan.ru:   
   > >   
   > > > Fritz Wuehler once wrote, without thinking too much beforehand:   
   > > > > Radio Claashole  sent:   
   > > > > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:   
   > > > > > > Nomen Nescio  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous  posted   
   > > > > > > > some news:20251024.191615.6d53543f@yamn.paranoici.org:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different   
   > > > > > > > > [Spam].   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to   
   > > > > > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN   
   > > > > > > > > / neodome to counter the jerk.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.   
   > > > > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.   
   > > > > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the   
   > > > > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic   
   > > > > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.   
   > > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in your   
   > > > eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must use Tor or   
   > > > you would shit in your pants without it. So much for TypeII   
   > > > 'anonymous' remailing.   
   > >   
   > > It all works with Tor.   No Tor, no work.   
   >   
   > Remailers don't need Tor at all.  Tor was developed long after the   
   > invention of anonymous remailing in order to have something similar for   
   > from the anonymity perspective inherently problematic real-time (web)   
   > communication.   
   >   
   > You send some packets to the entry remailer and nobody can figure out   
   > which mail message at some exit remailer they represent, if any, as you   
   > just may have sent dummy packets. That isn't pseudonymity, it's true   
   > anonymity no matter what shithead Claas tells you.   
   >   
      
   I think you are the liar and real shithead! Why? Because these pseudonymous   
   remailers are publicity run and known as old fashioned TypeII clearnet smtp   
   networks where Eve and her friends only need to append the secret keys from   
   remailers, to decrypt the incomming messages at an entry.  This can be done   
   with gag orders. If you would know how the internals work from such old and   
   outdated TypeII technology you would not speak such rubbish.   
      
   And secondly when looking at the pools Eve and her friends see in clear the   
   remailer packets and the To: header, while messages at exits are held in an   
   decrypted state.   
      
   --   
   Из России с любовью.   
   https://radio-eriwan.ru   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)