XPost: alt.anonymous, alt.privacy.anon-server
From: nobody@dizum.com
On 26 Oct 2025, Anonymous User posted some
news:20251026.170305.be01efa2@dirge.harmsk.com:
> On 26 Oct 2025, Nomen Nescio posted some
> news:a65087ac1b123024feba111429b2b1ae@dizum.com:
>
>> On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan posted some
>> news:1761435073483161656.ac@radio-eriwan.ru:
>>
>>> Fritz Wuehler once wrote, without thinking too much beforehand:
>>>> Radio Claashole sent:
>>>> > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>>>> > > Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>> > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous posted
>>>> > > > some news:20251024.191615.6d53543f@yamn.paranoici.org:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different
>>>> > > > > [Spam].
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to
>>>> > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use
>>>> > > > > YAMN / neodome to counter the jerk.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>>>> > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>>>> > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>>>>
>>>> We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>>>> stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>>>> principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in your
>>> eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must use Tor or
>>> you would shit in your pants without it. So much for TypeII
>>> 'anonymous' remailing.
>>
>> It all works with Tor. No Tor, no work.
>
> That's right. +1
wrong it works perfectly fine without tor.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
