XPost: alt.anonymous, alt.privacy.anon-server   
   From: noreply@dirge.harmsk.com   
      
   Stefan Claas wrote:   
   >Yamn2 Remailer wrote:   
   >> Stefan Claas  wrote:   
   >> > Gabx wrote:   
   >> > > Fritz Wuehler wrote:   
   >> > > > Radio Claashole  sent:   
   >> > > > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:   
   >> > > > > > Nomen Nescio  wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous  posted   
   some   
   >> > > > > > > news:20251024.191615.6d53543f@yamn.paranoici.org:   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different   
   [Spam].   
   >> > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to   
   destroy groups   
   >> > > > > > > > and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN / neodome to   
   counter the   
   >> > > > > > > > jerk.   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?   
   >> > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.   
   >> > > > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.   
   >> > > > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!   
   >> > > > > >   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the   
   >> > > > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic   
   >> > > > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > Prove it by code !   
   >> >   
   >> > I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc. and   
   >> > defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to have   
   >> > something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So no time   
   >> > for coding, only time for propaganda.   
   >> >   
   >> > Regards   
   >> > Stefan   
   >>   
   >> Claas, when will you answer the questions asked in MID   
   >> <20251010.203923.78225683@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>   
   >> and <20251011.012118.431a560b@mixmin.net>, which would   
   >> make it easier to tell who's the propagandist here and   
   >> who's not?   
   >>   
   >   
   ><20251010.203923.78225683@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>   
   >> Worse - Pool size 1000 messages with a latency of no more that 20   
   >> minutes?  Where in the world will these 3k messages per hour come from?   
   >   
   >1000 was an assumption when it get very popular in the next couple   
   >of years. Now it is 400.   
   >   
   >> Worse - IYO, ok.  And how will the user be sure all of them are run by   
   >> different operators, when, on top of that, they hide their identities   
   >> behind .onion services?   
   >   
   >First of all, some Mixmaster and YAMN remops are only known to TLAs   
   >and LEA, but not to the community. The Onion Courier Mixnet is primarily   
   >intended for private use, so that families and friends can communicate   
   >anonymously and decentralized. A super big advantage over old TypeII,   
   >as one only need a little Raspberry Pi attached to his router and there   
   >is no learning curve, Domain registration and VPS registration required.   
   >   
   ><20251011.012118.431a560b@mixmin.net>   
   >> So a simple question: Is he right?   
      
   Yes, he is in each and every respect!   
      
   >   
   >You should have learned that I am a honest person   
      
   ... who continues to avoid answering the key questions raised   
   by the articles mentioned above that unmask his flawed hacks.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)