XPost: rec.food.cooking, can.politics
From: zed@is.dead
On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:08:45 +0000
"Doc Hammerslack" wrote:
> At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:57:27 -0600, phoenix
> wrote:
>
> > Mars Sellus wrote:
> > > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:29:53 +0000
> > > "Doc Hammerslack" wrote:
> > >
> > >> At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
> > >>> phoenix wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Mars Sellus wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
> > >>>>> phoenix wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> > >>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
> > >>>>>>>> "Doc Hammerslack" wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
> > >>>>>>>>>> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [...]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X 2
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was constructed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> sense.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
> > >>>>>>>>> intertwingled.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> But I think our world is natural.[*]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems
> > >>>>>>>>> to be part of it.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years before
> > >>>>>>>>> the fourth gospel was written.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from time
> > >>>>>>>> to time.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them from
> > >>>>>> great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
> > >>>> human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
> > >>>> maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark
> > >>>> rituals.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> You are on point.
> > >>>
> > >>> Christ is King!
> > >>
> > >> God doesn't like it when you do that.
> > >
> > > The Holy Trinity are as one, hadn't you heard?
> >
> > Is it that clear when the Book of Enoch is missing from the Bible?
> >
> > I don't teach the Trinity. I was told that married laymen cannot
> > explain or understand it.
>
> That's not hard to understand -- there were a lot of religions with
> trinities floating around back then.
>
> Nobody can explain it -- it is a "mystery".
>
Ergo the need for both faith and divine guidance.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
