XPost: rec.food.cooking, can.politics, alt.bible   
   From: zed@is.dead   
      
   On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:36:45 -0600   
   phoenix  wrote:   
      
   > Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600   
   > > phoenix  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600   
   > >>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   > >>>>> At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus    
   > >>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600   
   > >>>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600   
   > >>>>>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus   
   > >>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> "Doc Hammerslack"  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 * 1 != 1 ^2.  Your original equation was constructed   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> intertwingled.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> But I think our world is natural.[*]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> to be part of it.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> before the fourth gospel was written.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> time to time.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them   
   > >>>>>>>>> from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> +1   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear   
   > >>>>>>> human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that   
   > >>>>>>> maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark   
   > >>>>>>> rituals.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> +1   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> You are on point.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Christ is King!   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> God doesn't like it when you do that.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> And that must be sufficient.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Idolatry?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>> The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood   
   > >>>> because I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein   
   > >>>> Camp.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You hear voices, as in multiple?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Please elaborate.   
   > >>   
   > >> Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the   
   > >> time. I can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental   
   > >> like all voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over   
   > >> everything, and heating up my red eyes.   
   > >   
   > > Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?   
   >   
   > I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for anger   
   > very well, being a man of self-control.   
      
   Understood, it fits that.   
      
   Those voices were not your friends.   
      
   But some (I believe) can be.   
      
   Test using Christ and all will be revealed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)