XPost: rec.food.cooking, can.politics, alt.bible   
   From: Hank@nospam.invalid   
      
   Mars Sellus wrote on 2/21/2026 5:42 PM:   
   > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:36:45 -0600   
   > phoenix  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600   
   >>> phoenix  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600   
   >>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   >>>>>>> At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600   
   >>>>>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Mars Sellus wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600   
   >>>>>>>>>> phoenix  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Doc Hammerslack"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 * 1 != 1 ^2.  Your original equation was constructed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> intertwingled.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I think our world is natural.[*]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be part of it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the fourth gospel was written.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> time to time.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them   
   >>>>>>>>>>> from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> +1   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear   
   >>>>>>>>> human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that   
   >>>>>>>>> maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark   
   >>>>>>>>> rituals.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> +1   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You are on point.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Christ is King!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> God doesn't like it when you do that.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And that must be sufficient.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Idolatry?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood   
   >>>>>> because I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein   
   >>>>>> Camp.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You hear voices, as in multiple?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Please elaborate.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the   
   >>>> time. I can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental   
   >>>> like all voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over   
   >>>> everything, and heating up my red eyes.   
   >>>   
   >>> Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?   
   >>   
   >> I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for anger   
   >> very well, being a man of self-control.   
   >   
   > Understood, it fits that.   
   >   
   > Those voices were not your friends.   
   >   
   > But some (I believe) can be.   
   >   
   > Test using Christ and all will be revealed.   
   >   
      
   It's a hell of a lot faster and easier to simply go to truth social and   
   ask.  The answer is always perfectly acceptable to christ.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)