home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.collecting.beanie-babies      Stupid 90's fad that set Ebay on fire      2,097 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 217 of 2,097   
   Kevin to Tinkerbell   
   Re: Ronnie the Ronald Reagan Bear   
   27 Jul 03 18:35:14   
   
   From: DominicandCaitlinsDad@comcast.net   
      
   Nope, you can't teach below, but you can ALWAYS teach above.  I stand firm   
   in this.  At least in America you can.   
   "Tinkerbell"  wrote in message   
   news:1059323757.44115.0@despina.uk.clara.net...   
   >   
   > "Kevin"  wrote in message   
   > news:zSSUa.140905   
   > > This is untrue.  You can always teach ABOVE the NC, just not below it.   
   >   
   > Yes you can...if you have the time. Lets face it though, most teachers   
   > *don't* have the time, with a class full of 30 or so children. If my child   
   > wakes up wanting to learn about Ancient Egypt at the age of 6 even though   
   > (for instance) it isn't covered in the NC until they're 8 then we do so.   
   If   
   > a child of 6 goes in to school and asks their teacher to tell them all   
   about   
   > Ancient Egypt even though they're supposed to be learning about the   
   > Victorians that day it just isn't going to happen. It's not practical.   
   > My opinion is that by making a child wait until it's the 'right' time   
   > according to the NC you're not capitalising on their natural enthusiasm.   
   > When a child is interested in a subject they'll learn about it far more   
   > easily, and have fun at the same time.   
   >   
   > --   
   > June   
   > www.he-ed.org.uk   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca