From: arl_123234@hotmail.com   
      
   On 03/31/2015 12:33 AM, brshsg@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 11:47:30 AM UTC-5, Boat...@aol.com   
   > wrote:   
   >> It's a matter of whether you prefer the visual approach along with   
   >> the audible one. If the visual approach is not a factor, the '70's   
   >> and '80's boxes are great for breaking out your old collection of   
   >> 45's, not only to maintain your pocketbook sanity, but to iliminate   
   >> the turntable duty every 3-4 minutes, (with a home system).   
     So in regards to your question it depends if you   
   > just want the looks or a great sound. Just my 2 cents worth.  Norm   
   >   
   Hello, and I was the original poster.  You seem to be implying that the   
   later (let's say those that hide the mechanics) models sound better than   
   the prior-decade(s) models.  I certainly can understand that the   
   state-of-the-art in audio components would've improved over the years   
   but how much better sound quality are we talking about? (Assume that a   
   jukebox regardless of its date of manufacture is operating close to   
   original factory specs with records in good condition).  Thanks for your   
   time and comment.  Sincerely,   
      
      
   --   
   J. B. Wood	            e-mail: arl_123234@hotmail.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)