home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.collecting.stamps      Stamp collecting      1,744 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,694 of 1,744   
   felix_unger to DanielSan   
   Re: What kind of God..?   
   22 Jan 12 14:40:55   
   
   XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: aus.religion.christian   
   From: me@nothere.com   
      
   On 22-January-2012 1:48 PM, DanielSan wrote:   
      
   > On 1/21/2012 6:17 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >> On 22-January-2012 1:03 PM, DanielSan wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 1/21/2012 3:46 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>> On 22-January-2012 5:44 AM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:   
   >>>>> On Jan 21, 1:41 am, DanielSan wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:36 AM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 21-January-2012 7:28 PM, DanielSan wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 11:25 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 21-January-2012 6:10 PM, Olrik wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Le 2012-01-21 02:01, felix_unger a écrit :   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 21-January-2012 5:56 PM, NEMO wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> _ G O D _ the COck-sucking retard!   
   >>>>>>>>>>> atheists themselves are one of the best arguments against   
   >>>>>>>>>>> atheism. are   
   >>>>>>>>>>> there any happy atheists?   
   >>>>>>>>>> I am.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Besides, all atheists share is the lack of beliefs in some   
   >>>>>>>>>> "god" or   
   >>>>>>>>>> "gods".   
   >>>>>>>>>> Anything else is up for grabs.   
   >>>>>>>>>> You should know that by now, felix_unger.   
   >>>>>>>>> nope. humans are not machines. our beliefs determine our   
   >>>>>>>>> behaviour,   
   >>>>>>>> Yep.   
   >>>>>>>>> and atheism is a belief   
   >>>>>>>> Atheism is not a belief. Atheists themselves have wide and varying   
   >>>>>>>> beliefs, however, just like those that don't collect stamps have   
   >>>>>>>> wide   
   >>>>>>>> and varying beliefs.   
   >>>>>>> well you got one out of two right   
   >>>>>> Nope. Two out of two. Atheism is no more a belief than not   
   >>>>>> collecting   
   >>>>>> stamps is a hobby.   
   >>>>> Beautiful clarity! That's the best metaphor I've ever seen regarding   
   >>>>> the definition of atheism. I'm going to be quoting you from time-to-   
   >>>>> time on that one.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> LOL! Daniel, you have fan!   
   >>>   
   >>> That's nice.   
   >>>   
   >>> How about actually responding to my post?   
   >>   
   >> didn't we both agree to disagree?   
   >   
   > No.  You lied and I told the truth.   
      
   short memory eh, Nappisan..   
      
   17/1/12   
      
    >> EOD. there's no point in discussing further. you're not going to change   
    >> your mind, and neither am I. unfortunately (for you) you can't see how   
    >> silly you appear to 'normal' ppl.   
    >   
    > I can't make you believe that the sun rises in the east no matter   
   what I say nor can I make you believe that atheism is the LACK OF THEISM.   
    >   
    > But, you're probably right.  There really is no point in discussing   
   further.  You're wrong and refuse to correct yourself (or even realize   
   that you ARE wrong).   
    >   
      
   >   
   >> we have discussed ad nauseam.   
   >   
   > You mean that you lied ad nauseam and I told the truth ad nauseam.   
   >   
   >> there's  no point in rehashing because you don't address what is put   
   >> to you.   
   >   
   > And there's another lie.   
   >   
   >> you   
   >> brand anything you don't agree with as lies, and the authors as liars,   
   >   
   > What should I call falsehoods told with a deliberate intent to   
   > deceive?  Candy bars?   
   >   
   >> and spruik the atheist mantra ad nauseaum until you come up against a   
   >> brick wall,   
   >   
   > Like what?   
   >   
   >> which you then skirt around   
   >   
   > For example?   
   >   
   >> and try to direct the discussion   
   >> back to your stock lines,   
   >   
   > Why don't you provide examples of what I allegedly do?   
   >   
   >> and we're back to square one. either that or   
   >> you wet your pants, and just cut and run like you did with fasgnadh.   
   >   
   > I didn't cut and run with fasgnadh.  I couldn't make head or tails of   
   > that mess.   
   >   
   >> I'm   
   >> not getting on that merry-go-round with you again. so you can keep   
   >> trying, but it won't work.   
   >   
   > Fine.  You don't want to tell the truth, I can't make you.   
      
   you couldn't get your story straight if your life depended on it..   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   “If Julia is the answer, then what was the stupid question?!”   
      
   "Julia finally got something right. Older people don't vote Labor, because   
   they have seen too many incompetent, mismanaging, money-wasting Labor   
   governments"   
      
   "I regard the prime minister to be in breach of the written agreement she   
   signed, leaving me no option but to honour my word and end my current   
   relationship with her government. We should be able to trust our politicians   
   to keep their word. Frankly a    
   deal is a deal" - Andrew Wilkie, Federal Member for Denison   
      
   “All that's needed now is a small miracle to rid us of the worst prime   
   minister and the worst government in Australia's history”   
      
     "If the WORLD as a whole cut ALL emissions tomorrow, the average temperature   
   of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over on   
   thousand years" - Tim Flannery, Climate Commissioner   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca