XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
XPost: aus.religion.christian
From: danielsan1977@gmail.com
On 1/21/2012 7:40 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 22-January-2012 1:48 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>
>> On 1/21/2012 6:17 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>> On 22-January-2012 1:03 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/21/2012 3:46 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>> On 22-January-2012 5:44 AM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:
>>>>>> On Jan 21, 1:41 am, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:36 AM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 21-January-2012 7:28 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 11:25 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 21-January-2012 6:10 PM, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 2012-01-21 02:01, felix_unger a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21-January-2012 5:56 PM, NEMO wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _ G O D _ the COck-sucking retard!
>>>>>>>>>>>> atheists themselves are one of the best arguments against
>>>>>>>>>>>> atheism. are
>>>>>>>>>>>> there any happy atheists?
>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>> Besides, all atheists share is the lack of beliefs in some
>>>>>>>>>>> "god" or
>>>>>>>>>>> "gods".
>>>>>>>>>>> Anything else is up for grabs.
>>>>>>>>>>> You should know that by now, felix_unger.
>>>>>>>>>> nope. humans are not machines. our beliefs determine our
>>>>>>>>>> behaviour,
>>>>>>>>> Yep.
>>>>>>>>>> and atheism is a belief
>>>>>>>>> Atheism is not a belief. Atheists themselves have wide and varying
>>>>>>>>> beliefs, however, just like those that don't collect stamps have
>>>>>>>>> wide
>>>>>>>>> and varying beliefs.
>>>>>>>> well you got one out of two right
>>>>>>> Nope. Two out of two. Atheism is no more a belief than not
>>>>>>> collecting
>>>>>>> stamps is a hobby.
>>>>>> Beautiful clarity! That's the best metaphor I've ever seen regarding
>>>>>> the definition of atheism. I'm going to be quoting you from time-to-
>>>>>> time on that one.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! Daniel, you have fan!
>>>>
>>>> That's nice.
>>>>
>>>> How about actually responding to my post?
>>>
>>> didn't we both agree to disagree?
>>
>> No. You lied and I told the truth.
>
> short memory eh, Nappisan..
>
> 17/1/12
>
> >> EOD. there's no point in discussing further. you're not going to change
> >> your mind, and neither am I. unfortunately (for you) you can't see how
> >> silly you appear to 'normal' ppl.
> >
> > I can't make you believe that the sun rises in the east no matter
> what I say nor can I make you believe that atheism is the LACK OF THEISM.
> >
> > But, you're probably right. There really is no point in discussing
> further. You're wrong and refuse to correct yourself (or even realize
> that you ARE wrong).
> >
>
>>
>>> we have discussed ad nauseam.
>>
>> You mean that you lied ad nauseam and I told the truth ad nauseam.
>>
>>> there's no point in rehashing because you don't address what is put
>>> to you.
>>
>> And there's another lie.
>>
>>> you
>>> brand anything you don't agree with as lies, and the authors as liars,
>>
>> What should I call falsehoods told with a deliberate intent to
>> deceive? Candy bars?
>>
>>> and spruik the atheist mantra ad nauseaum until you come up against a
>>> brick wall,
>>
>> Like what?
>>
>>> which you then skirt around
>>
>> For example?
>>
>>> and try to direct the discussion
>>> back to your stock lines,
>>
>> Why don't you provide examples of what I allegedly do?
>>
>>> and we're back to square one. either that or
>>> you wet your pants, and just cut and run like you did with fasgnadh.
>>
>> I didn't cut and run with fasgnadh. I couldn't make head or tails of
>> that mess.
>>
>>> I'm
>>> not getting on that merry-go-round with you again. so you can keep
>>> trying, but it won't work.
>>
>> Fine. You don't want to tell the truth, I can't make you.
>
> you couldn't get your story straight if your life depended on it..
I really don't know what you're talking about. What leads you to
believe that?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
