XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: aus.religion.christian   
   From: me@nothere.com   
      
   On 24-January-2012 7:12 AM, John Baker wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:57:41 +1100, felix_unger   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 23-January-2012 4:23 AM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Jan 22, 1:46 am, felix_unger   wrote:   
   >>>> On 22-January-2012 7:46 PM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Jan 21, 5:48 pm, felix_unger    wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 22-January-2012 12:28 PM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Jan 21, 3:46 pm, felix_unger     wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 22-January-2012 5:44 AM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Beautiful clarity!  That's the best metaphor I've ever seen regarding   
   >>>>>>>>> the definition of atheism.  I'm going to be quoting you from time-to-   
   >>>>>>>>> time on that one.   
   >>>>>>>> LOL! Daniel, you have fan!   
   >>>>>>> Is it getting hot in here?   
   >>>>>> don't give up your day job..!   
   >>>>> I don't exist, yet you think I have a day job?   
   >>>> oh.. my humble apologies. who's doing the typing btw?   
   >>> [snip]   
   >>>   
   >>> Believing in me (a logical fallacy) could put you at risk of offending   
   >>> your monotheistic god.  Are you really sure you want to go down this   
   >>> path?   
   >> If you're not interested in rational discussion, I shall bid you gooday.   
   > On the contrary, we're *very* interested in rational discussion. You   
   > really must come and visit us again when you're capable of it.   
   >   
      
   with an invitation like that, I shall disrespectfully decline   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)