XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: aus.religion.christian   
   From: danielsan1977@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/27/2012 4:45 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   > On 28-January-2012 9:45 AM, DanielSan wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 1/27/2012 2:44 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>> On 28-January-2012 3:46 AM, John Baker wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:11:36 +1100, felix_unger   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> convince others in this manner, especially in a newsgroup like   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism where skepticism reigns supreme?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You are the one who chose to engage people here, and you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> definitely   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> got perspective by doing so.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Oh yes, I certainly did   
   >>>>> cras amet qui nunquam amavit; quique amavit, cras amet   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I shall bid you goodday. I have no interest in continuing with this.   
   >>>>> it's purposeless and time consuming.   
   >>>> In other words, you've just been owned.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, Spanky. We wouldn't   
   >>>> want you to suffer brain damage.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> ah yes.. another hateful atheist who cannot tolerate honesty and truth.   
   >>   
   >> Sorry, but where was the honesty and truth?   
   >   
   > can't you read??.. "I shall bid you goodday. I have no interest in   
   > continuing with this.   
   > it's purposeless and time consuming".   
   >   
   >> Looked like a bunch of lies and distortions to me. Hypocrite.   
   >>   
   >>> why am I not surprised.   
   >>   
   >> Because you're not willing to speak with someone that disagrees with   
   >> you in a mature manner and have to rely on insults?   
   >   
   > nonsense. John Wanker has proven that he offers nothing but personal   
   > attacks.   
      
   Which you have do, too.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)