XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: aus.religion.christian   
   From: me@nothere.com   
      
   On 28-January-2012 12:12 PM, DanielSan wrote:   
      
   > On 1/27/2012 5:09 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >> On 28-January-2012 11:46 AM, DanielSan wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 1/27/2012 4:45 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>> On 28-January-2012 9:45 AM, DanielSan wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 1/27/2012 2:44 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 28-January-2012 3:46 AM, John Baker wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:11:36 +1100, felix_unger   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince others in this manner, especially in a newsgroup   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism where skepticism reigns supreme?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the one who chose to engage people here, and you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got perspective by doing so.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh yes, I certainly did   
   >>>>>>>> cras amet qui nunquam amavit; quique amavit, cras amet   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I shall bid you goodday. I have no interest in continuing with   
   >>>>>>>> this.   
   >>>>>>>> it's purposeless and time consuming.   
   >>>>>>> In other words, you've just been owned.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, Spanky. We wouldn't   
   >>>>>>> want you to suffer brain damage.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ah yes.. another hateful atheist who cannot tolerate honesty and   
   >>>>>> truth.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Sorry, but where was the honesty and truth?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> can't you read??.. "I shall bid you goodday. I have no interest in   
   >>>> continuing with this. it's purposeless and time consuming".   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Looked like a bunch of lies and distortions to me. Hypocrite.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> why am I not surprised.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Because you're not willing to speak with someone that disagrees with   
   >>>>> you in a mature manner and have to rely on insults?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> nonsense. John Wanker has proven that he offers nothing but personal   
   >>>> attacks.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which you have do, too.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I offer opinion, facts, and arguments,   
   >   
   > No, you really haven't.  Facts and arguments, that is.   
   >   
   >> and I have copped a lot of ad-hom   
   >> for my trouble from atheists, including you.   
   >   
   > Actually, you have copped a lot of ad-hom, too.   
   >   
   >> I give what I get.   
   >   
   > Where did I do it to you first?   
   >   
   >> If you   
   >> don't like what I have to say, don't talk to me.   
   >   
   > Feeling's mutual.   
      
   ok. starting now. you misrepresent and distort things. and to say I have   
   offered no facts or arguments in ALL that I have posted on these matters   
   here, is, to use one of your favourite words, lying!. and when I even   
   proved you wrong *by pure logic*, regarding your 'belief' you still   
   denied it. you say you're open minded but in all my exchanges with you,   
   you have shown otherwise- entirely unwilling to see any interpretations   
   but your own.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)