XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
XPost: aus.religion.christian
From: danielsan1977@gmail.com
On 1/28/2012 3:04 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 29-January-2012 12:55 AM, ThomMadura wrote:
>
>> On 1/27/2012 8:44 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>> On 28-January-2012 12:29 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/27/2012 5:27 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>> On 28-January-2012 12:12 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/27/2012 5:09 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28-January-2012 11:46 AM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/27/2012 4:45 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 28-January-2012 9:45 AM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/27/2012 2:44 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 28-January-2012 3:46 AM, John Baker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:11:36 +1100, felix_unger
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince others in this manner, especially in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism where skepticism reigns supreme?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the one who chose to engage people here, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got perspective by doing so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh yes, I certainly did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cras amet qui nunquam amavit; quique amavit, cras amet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I shall bid you goodday. I have no interest in continuing with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's purposeless and time consuming.
>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, you've just been owned.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, Spanky. We
>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> want you to suffer brain damage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ah yes.. another hateful atheist who cannot tolerate honesty and
>>>>>>>>>>> truth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but where was the honesty and truth?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> can't you read??.. "I shall bid you goodday. I have no interest in
>>>>>>>>> continuing with this. it's purposeless and time consuming".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looked like a bunch of lies and distortions to me. Hypocrite.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> why am I not surprised.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because you're not willing to speak with someone that disagrees
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> you in a mature manner and have to rely on insults?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nonsense. John Wanker has proven that he offers nothing but
>>>>>>>>> personal
>>>>>>>>> attacks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which you have do, too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I offer opinion, facts, and arguments,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you really haven't. Facts and arguments, that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and I have copped a lot of ad-hom
>>>>>>> for my trouble from atheists, including you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, you have copped a lot of ad-hom, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I give what I get.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where did I do it to you first?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you
>>>>>>> don't like what I have to say, don't talk to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feeling's mutual.
>>>>>
>>>>> ok. starting now. you misrepresent and distort things. and to say I
>>>>> have
>>>>> offered no facts or arguments in ALL that I have posted on these
>>>>> matters
>>>>> here, is, to use one of your favourite words, lying!. and when I even
>>>>> proved you wrong *by pure logic*, regarding your 'belief' you still
>>>>> denied it. you say you're open minded but in all my exchanges with
>>>>> you,
>>>>> you have shown otherwise- entirely unwilling to see any
>>>>> interpretations
>>>>> but your own.
>>>>
>>>> See what I mean? What am I supposed to call someone that tells
>>>> falsehoods with the intent to deceive?
>>>
>>> Daniel San
>>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry = but it is felix unger who has posted in favor of the existence
>> of gods - that he has NEVER supported with proof that would establish
>> the clainm to be factual
>
> You lie Doc. you've said this more than once too. quote me! and you
> claim to be agnostic but you seem to be anti-god/religion. seems many
> ppl here see what they want to see, but won't back up their claims.
I'm an agnostic, too. And I am not anti-god/religion.
>> THOSE that have posted against the claimed gods- are speaking from
>> knowledge - as I have pointed out. IT is impossible for a single being
>> to fulfill the claims religions have made for their gods - so the gods
>> of religion have to be fairy tales
>
> “Snip, run and Lie ... the atheist Trinity”
>
> Daniel San ran like a scared rabbit when fasgnadh confronted him with
> logical arguments against his claims for atheism.
No, I really didn't.
> he runs, dodges,
> obfuscates, distorts, misrepresents, or straight out lies.
You can't point to a single piece of evidence for this claim, can you?
> I'll say it
> again.. unless ppl here want to DISCUSS the issues, without attacks and
> criticism (just look at what's said about me above in this post alone!),
> then just don't talk to me.
You came in attacking atheists with falsehoods and insisting that
atheists that were correcting you were lying.
> But I'm beginning to doubt if there is
> anyone here willing to discuss honestly. when I have posed legitimate
> questions to ppl directly, they disappear from the discussion. you all
> seem to be just pushing your own barrow.
Are you done with your lies?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
