From: please@.sk   
      
   #1: It isn't "spam". It is an advertisement for a stamp show, soemthing that   
   falls well within what is normally acceptable in a STAMP newsgroup.  Yes,   
   yes, provided it doens't have a Charter that specifically prohibit such   
   advertisements.   
      
   #2: This is a non-Chartered group, making it even more difficult to define   
   what is or what isn't acceptable than if it were a Chartered group.   
      
   #3: It was so obviously hype as to even get through to the most stupid and   
   naive of readers. "Actionable"? Give me a break! But, for the sake of fun   
   and frivolity, why don't you provide two humans on the planet who are goign   
   to the show expectign to receive 100% catalog value for their stamps. Just   
   two our of all these billions.   
      
   #4: I'd love to knwo whether this is a personal disagreement or not. It has   
   all the earmarks of one.   
      
   HAND :-)   
      
   "J. A. Mc."  wrote in message   
   news:bknbj096cejmou3isj3erserkhirbjckeh@4ax.com...   
   > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:01:23 -0500, "spam this"  found   
   these   
   > unused words floating about:   
   >   
   > >   
   > >Man, you are wound kind of tight , aren't you?   
   > >   
   > Only for SPAMmers who think misleading and poor english statements are   
   > 'funny'.   
   >   
   > If this is what you have to do to get attendance ... then IMHO, your   
   'show'   
   > is not worth it!   
   >   
   > As I said, if some poor thick, typically "ejukated" clod were to expend   
   > effort and funds to go there, believing your puffery, he/she/it would have   
   > an actionable complaint against the show.   
   >   
   > HAGD   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)