From: jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com   
      
   Thank you !!!   
      
   I'll be sure to double check my disdigic typing just for ewe.   
      
   (yes ... meant as "ewe")   
      
      
   Kirk Splaat   
      
   On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:49:42 GMT, Don  found these   
   unused words floating about:   
      
   >While you are on the subject:   
   >   
   >	something is not the same as soemthing   
   >	and   
   >	know is not the same as knwo   
   >   
   >Thought you would  like to know...   
   >   
   >Don   
   >   
   >On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:43:17 GMT, "Peter D"  wrote:   
   >   
   >>#1: It isn't "spam". It is an advertisement for a stamp show, soemthing that   
   >>falls well within what is normally acceptable in a STAMP newsgroup.  Yes,   
   >>yes, provided it doens't have a Charter that specifically prohibit such   
   >>advertisements.   
   >>   
   >>#2: This is a non-Chartered group, making it even more difficult to define   
   >>what is or what isn't acceptable than if it were a Chartered group.   
   >>   
   >>#3: It was so obviously hype as to even get through to the most stupid and   
   >>naive of readers. "Actionable"? Give me a break! But, for the sake of fun   
   >>and frivolity, why don't you provide two humans on the planet who are goign   
   >>to the show expectign to receive 100% catalog value for their stamps. Just   
   >>two our of all these billions.   
   >>   
   >>#4: I'd love to knwo whether this is a personal disagreement or not. It has   
   >>all the earmarks of one.   
   >>   
   >>HAND :-)   
   >>   
   >>"J. A. Mc."  wrote in message   
   >>news:bknbj096cejmou3isj3erserkhirbjckeh@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:01:23 -0500, "spam this"  found   
   >>these   
   >>> unused words floating about:   
   >>>   
   >>> >   
   >>> >Man, you are wound kind of tight , aren't you?   
   >>> >   
   >>> Only for SPAMmers who think misleading and poor english statements are   
   >>> 'funny'.   
   >>>   
   >>> If this is what you have to do to get attendance ... then IMHO, your   
   >>'show'   
   >>> is not worth it!   
   >>>   
   >>> As I said, if some poor thick, typically "ejukated" clod were to expend   
   >>> effort and funds to go there, believing your puffery, he/she/it would have   
   >>> an actionable complaint against the show.   
   >>>   
   >>> HAGD   
   >>>   
   >>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)