From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   hehe; nothing wrong with being a woman...  but I think he was taking a   
   dig (at least I read it that way).  If so, those are childish retorts;   
   and so not worthy of worrying about.   
      
   Personally, I've taken the light hearted approach lately.  If nothing   
   good is going to be said, then at least have fun with it.  It seem to   
   be working a little better.   
      
   On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:29:54 -0500, "Gummby3"    
   wrote:   
      
   >Yeah, screen names can be confusing regarding the sex of the poster.   
   >Any other time, I would give that too you, but seeing as my first name   
   >has always been included in my signature for the last 10 years, you   
   >are not confused.  You are just not observant.  Also, my screen name   
   >is Gummby.  If you're going to try to belittle, please, PLEASE be   
   >observant so that it will at least make sense.  It will greatly aid   
   >you in communication correctly with others.  Your attempt with the   
   >female jab just resonates in the air with no reasoning and/or   
   >substance.  Nice try though, but it's basically a cyber version of   
   >someone left hanging there with an unanswered high five.  Finally, as   
   >for a "big wheel", I'm simply a collector that actually comes to an   
   >autograph message group to **GASP** talk about the hobby of autograph   
   >collecting.  Nothing more, nothing less.   
   >   
   >I also appreciate your attempt at trying to make others look dumb, but   
   >as with your "sarcasm", you simply are not talented enough to pull it   
   >off...  If you would actually attempt to communicate with the people   
   >on here, that you obviously are anxious to be with, we might be able   
   >to discern the difference between your communication and your "humor".   
   >In my case, if you feel that you have to AGAIN try to belittle me, for   
   >no reason, then I guess that's that.  I have done nothing but try to   
   >talk with you, several times, but you seem to be the one with a   
   >pathological tendency.  There's no other explanation for someone, as   
   >yourself, who claims to be interested in autographs, in some odd   
   >fashion, but tries to feel like a BMOC in putting others down.  As for   
   >what I collect, I honestly have no reason. obligation, whatever to   
   >explain my collecting to someone like you.  Take that comment as you   
   >will.  You're really just not worth the trouble or bandwidth.   
   >   
   >"Confusion, of a pathological degree, usually refers to loss of   
   >orientation   
   >> (ability to place oneself correctly in the world by time, location,   
   >> and personal identity) and often memory (ability to correctly recall   
   >> previous events or learn new material)."   
   >   
   >So, is the above definition your attempt at explaining why you were   
   >not comprehending why Sue responded to your questions with answers?   
   >That is enlightening.  Thank you for clearing that up for us. ;-)   
   >   
   >Again, I have not belittled you.  I have not put you down as a person.   
   >I have simply responded to your post like an adult.  I bet that you   
   >can't, or won't, return the favor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)