From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   And with Barefoot making the first accusatory post.   
      
   If it were me and I suspected the guy was a forger who took wireless   
   images and PRETENDED they were HIS (which is stupid as he said, they   
   have the watermark on them), I'd simply have asked the guy why he has   
   those images on there and let him explain.  Same if he sold fogeries.   
   I'd ask where he got them etc.  I'd let him get caught in the lies (as   
   you know, liars always get caught up in their own stuff).  There are   
   more tactful ways without accusations which may or may NOT be true.   
   Now we'll never know.  It's a flame war... with no merit and people   
   will ignore both sides and both sides will lose out because NOBODY   
   will trust either of them.   
      
   On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:25:05 -0500, "Gummby3"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Actually, it's been fairly pleasant in the group for the last couple   
   >of months.  This "he said" crap just started AGAIN within the last   
   >2-3 days.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)