From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   that's true; they may be behind; Ours was listed as less than what we   
   actually have (not by much but a couple)>   
      
   On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:38:07 -0700, Evan Platt   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:24:58 -0400, Sue H  wrote:   
   >   
   >>I looked up all the "autograph" "autographs" groups and there weren't   
   >>that many and only three or four had more than 15-20 members.  They do   
   >>tell you how many members at the bottom ... take another look   
   >   
   >Yeah, but as I said, there is no way to tell in a Usenet group how   
   >many 'members' there are, as this data isn't stored anywhere. I don't   
   >know how Google Groups is counting 'members', but it's not going to be   
   >accurate.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)