From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   There were some checks there and a couple contracts.  However, the Led   
   Zeppelin was from an early photo (yes, appeared to be many moons ago   
   as you said; I believe from thd 70's).  In order for me to do these,   
   it took a long time. I did contemplate putting (signed check/document   
   etc).  I'll do that later on (it's a good idea). The date listed is   
   when I added it but all the sigs aren't always known when they were   
   done so I could start annotating that too).  Now that I got it   
   started, it should be a little easier to do more so I can probably add   
   more. I got a crap load to do still.  I hope someone benefits from it.   
      
   If you ever see something way wrong, yes, I'd love to know (that's why   
   the disclaimer).  Most of the stuff looks good though.  Only a handful   
   seem to be modern sigs (all ths Star Wars sigs were modern day - 90's   
   and 200's in my opinion as well as some of the film poster signings).   
   But most are very vintage.  How they acquire this stuff one only   
   knows.  Many seem to be celebrities own collections (several film   
   crew/actors etc giving their stuff to sell or a lot of them are from   
   collections from estate, like William Plunkett who had numerous   
   paintings of his own as well as other artists and some celebrity   
   letters and such..   
      
      
      
   On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:49:57 -0400, "AutographPros.com"   
    wrote:   
      
   >If I could make one suggestion, if you use any check or contracts for   
   >signature examples, it should be noted as such, and the same for if you use   
   >vintage references of modern stars. The reason I mention this is many people   
   >sign contracts and checks differently than they sign autographs for fans.   
   >For example the led Zeppelin autographs.  That Jimmy Page signature and   
   >Robert Plant are nothing like what one would expect to get in person.  My   
   >guess is it's either from MANY moons ago or from a contract.  In either   
   >case, that type of information would be beneficial.  Again, it's only a   
   >suggestion as I can tell you put a lot of hard work into this so I am not   
   >trying to discredit your efforts in any way.  I'd expect many to benefit   
   >from your labors.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)