From: dahoov2@cox.net
I know all the dealers who do signings with Star Wars and harry Potter
people. I would agree he's not one. ESPECIALLY Ford. That's a hard
one to get and only two have done it. Three if you count Master
Replicas a few years ago. Still, that is not to say he didn't get
them at cons or in person. However, I still have not looked (have a
lot of people coming today for pickups on items I've given away and
out later so probably not time today either). But with all the
controversy, it's been my mantra that if your gut tells you something,
it's probably true. When you first look at something you get this
feeling within seconds... first it COULD be excitement, but then you
get this "red flag" thing that if you ignore, you're pretty much
screwed.
PS Send me a link to a specific Star Wars item that you think is bad;
I can quickly look at that probably.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:04:11 -0400, "Sign4Me" wrote:
>Sorry Mike (gummby3), but you are wrong here. Over 80% of autographs out
>there are fake and ALL sellers need to be held to high standards, so while
>you say there is no solid evidence, what gives you the right to stand up for
>this guy. Did you go and look at his 15 Harrison Ford autographs to compare
>to known in-person ones or did you just assume he must have done signings
>with all of Star Wars and Harry Potter, etc? Did you look at his dozen Star
>Wars cast signed photos to see if they were even remotely close? You're
>wrong here. No seller deserves a defense unless you take the time to
>confirm they are one of the 20% of the good guys out there. Until then,
>Sue, Barefoot, and anyone else who wants to call out forgers, please keep
>doing so. None of the references this guy touted about has come on here in
>his defense. Let's hear from them! If you bought even 1 autograph from
>Strickler Sports, get it looked at by your favorite trusted source and let
>us know what they say. If you haven't, go look at this guys stuff. Enough
>is enough! This one is a no brainer.
>
>"Gummby3" wrote in message
>news:1206427432_817@isp.n...
>> Ultimately, nobody is guilty unless there is evidence that can not be
>> disputed. Keep in mind that people have put your reputation on task
>> several times, but I discard those too as nobody has every provided
>> evidence that is more than hearsay. I know that you have provided the "a"
>> is the same avenue, but that is far from concrete. I showed that with the
>> Hall IP compared to his Hall for sale. I personally know people that have
>> an "a" at the beginning of one of their names that makes that basic
>> design. Celebs, I can name one more off the top of my head: Arsenio Hall.
>> If I recall, his signature was even part of the opening credits of his
>> talk show, at one time. I understand that you feel that you are doing the
>> collecting community a service, and I applaud you for that, but all I'm
>> reading right now is inconclusive assumptions, just as they were with you.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Mike
>> Gummby3
>> -= Star Collector =-
>> www.star-collector.net
>> Celebrity addresses the way they should be - free.
>>
>>
>> "barefoot" wrote in message
>> news:a8f98314-0f43-4afb-90ed-3638e8aa73b0@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>i think it's funny how in strickler's mind, everyone is accused of
>>> misconduct...but not his, he's infallable.
>>> m
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
>> News==----
>> http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
>> Newsgroups
>> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
